CCMIN052196 - Laserfiche WebLink

continuing, but in this whole process he has acted more as a facilitator between the developer and the City. This plan is not all that much different than San Francisco's early plan. It took someone to take us off the discussion on will there or won't there be development and get to the point of what will it look like. If he can do design guidelines in the same philosophy as the rest of the process, she felt it would work well. She asked if there could be some financial participation from San Francisco in the cost of the design guidelines? With respect to the argument on number of units, she felt the number was not the issue, it was the design and overall feeling of neighborhood, the arabianee of the project. The success of the project and design are the real issues. She asked if the small parks could be maintained by homeowner associations? She lives in a small lot development and indicated the only street with speeding problems is the City street that is the collector from adjoining neighborhoods through hers. The streets are narrow and the problems are created from mixed residents - singles, young families with babies, and families with teenagers who have four or more cars. The design guidelines need to take into consideration that as kids grow up there will be multiple vehicles and overflow problems. Mr. Tarver responded that he appreciated the work of the Citizen' s Committee, Sharrell, the input from the community, the cooperation of San Francisco and Mr. Catthorpe. He did not believe that Alternative 5 looked anything like the Cooperative Plan. He strongly supported going through this process to get the best for the community. It worked to get to Alternative 5 and it will work to get good design guidelines. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarvet NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None It was moved by Mr. Tarver, seconded by Ms. Denn[% to direct staff to negotiate a contract for design guidelines to be addressed in an open and cooperative process. The rgll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarver NOES: Councilmember Michelotti ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None There was a break at 10:32 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 10:42 p.m. 05/21/96 -15-