CCMIN041696 - Laserfiche WebLink

Pleasanton has decided to look at something else. If, however, we approved the Cooperative Plan, San Francisco has agreed to annex to the City of Pleasanton. Mr. Tarvet felt the layout agreed to in the Cooperative Plan may not be the same, but the parts are still the same concepts. Ms. McGovern had spoken to two Supervisors who indicated that the Cooperative Plan could be approved by the County, if Pleasanton does not move forward to meet the deadline for agreement. Mr. Swift clarified that there are two ~Cooperative Plans". One, if developed in the City of Pleasanton, would have 1600-1900 units maximum and be served by the City. The other, if developed in the County, would have 2500 units maximum and would have all utility services provided by the County. San Francisco is processing a version of the Cooperative Plan through the County with 2500 units etc. Pleasanton's "cooperative plan" process is to take that land use diagram and elements to form the basis of the plan worked on by Mr. Calthorpe. We are using the same elements in terms of number of acres for each use with the goal of forming a plan approved by the City of Pleasanton. That may come before or after the County approval depending on the various processes. Mr. Tarver wanted to make it clear that it has been San Francisco's intention all along to get land use enti~ements from the County. Ms. McGovern realiTed this was an .extremely complex issue, but wanted to make sure we have protected ourselves and the assumptions are correct. She asked Council and staff to contact the Sacramento counterparts and get their input regarding the Laguna West project and what they see as the problems. Ms. Mohr asked how the School Board felt about moving the school and requiring it to obtain the entire ten acres instead of a five acre school site and five acre city park. Ms. McGovern was not sure that was the assumption made. She hoped the Park and Recreation Commission would recommend the School District buy the ten acres, so that some kind of recommendation would come before the Board for formal consideration. She asked one of the Park and Recreation Commissioners if the Commission would require a developer to provide another five acre neighborhood. She was told that happens. Ms. McGovern is waiting for a formal recommendation. There has been no School Board meeting since the workshop and there will not be another until April 30. Ms. Mohr's concern was that the decision to have one big park instead of scattered little ones would affect the School District property and felt there had been an informal agreement to provide a five acre park next to the school. She was concerned how that would affect the School District. She would like some feedback. 04/16/96 -13-