Laserfiche WebLink
(2) Reauest for a Waiver of Fees for the Proposed Snanos/Parkview Apartments Project. <br />(SR 96:62) <br /> <br /> This item was continued to the meeting of March 19, 1996. <br /> <br />Item 6C <br />Discussion concerning a city-owned golf course in Pleasanton. (SR 96:60) <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver explained that because of the recommendations of the Golf Course <br />Committee, he had directed staff to investigate the possibility of a city-owned golf course in <br />south Pleasanton and to commence negotiations with the property owners. The City Council has <br />never discussed this item and it is not to be assumed the project will happen unless there is <br />acceptance by the community. Other property owners have indicated the process is moving too <br />fast and they want to be part of the planning process to have their issues addressed. <br /> <br /> Deborah Acosta presented the staff presentation concerning feasibility of the golf course <br />and the history of the project. <br /> <br /> Susan Rossi presented the financial issues of the proposed golf course. <br /> <br /> Brian Swift presented the planning issues and environmental considerations. <br /> <br /> Randall Lure presented the infrastructure issues regarding water, sewer and storm drains. <br /> <br /> Roger Manning, 1300 Happy Valley Road, representing the proposed golf course <br />landowners, felt this proposal was an exceptional opportunity to finally bring the number one <br />site selected by the Golf Course Committee into the City. He indicated the golf course would <br />be 150 acres, 24 one-acre residential lots, and 138 acres of public access for horse Uails, <br />mountain bike trails, hiking/walking trails. The City of Pleasanton could make two golf courses <br />financially successful. He referred to other cities in the East Bay that have municipal golf <br />courses. He complimented the City staff on the studies and research that were done to prepare <br />this proposal. Mr. Manning indicated there a few residents who wanted nothing changed in the <br />area because of the horseriders, bikers and joggers who use the roads. He and three other <br />landowners walked the neighborhood and found the majority of the residents were in favor of <br />the project. They had concerns about specific issues such as water service, minimizing traffic <br />impacts, and downstream flooding on Happy Valley Creek. All those concerns can be solved <br />during the golf course planning. The staff has proposed a dual track: one to plan the golf <br />course; one to meet with the neighbors to resolve issues of concern. Mr. Manning urged <br />Council to approve the staff recommendations. He was concerned that if Council did not <br />proceed tonight, the proposal would be lost. It took eleven years to get the North Sycamore <br />plan. He felt the staff timeline was realistic and urged no delays to study issues that do not <br />affect the golf course. The homeowners were willing to meet with the Alisal Improvement Club <br /> <br />03~05~96 <br /> -7- <br /> <br /> <br />