My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN010296
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCMIN010296
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:45 AM
Creation date
5/13/1999 9:54:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/2/1996
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
about the recreational requirements and how this would be handled. She supported the design <br /> change. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti had doubts about the Bren project, but it tuned out that it fit a niche in <br /> the community. This is a major improvement to that plan and she really liked the design. Her <br /> one suggestion was to have some roof color variations but the overall color of the homes was <br /> pleasing. Even though the density is higher, she did not think it felt like it. She said automatic <br /> garage door openers were required and the CC&R's require that the cars be parked in the <br /> garages. She supported the project and hoped to be able to address Mr. Saucier's concerns. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked about the price difference from condo to single-family detached. <br /> <br /> Mr. Crews stated the pricing would be a bit higher but in the same general range as the <br /> townhomes. The homes are designed to fit between the Sienna and Valencia development and <br /> would be ten to fifteen thousand dollan higher in price. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Michelotti, seconded by Ms. Mohr, that the proposed project <br /> will no have a significant environmental impact and f'mds that the previously approved <br /> Negative Declaration covers this project. <br /> <br /> - The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, Mohr, and Mayor Tarver <br /> NOES: Councilmember Pico <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico felt that there will be parking problems in the future and thought the Council <br /> will have to resolve neighborhood disputes. He is concerned that famih'es with children will be <br /> brought into the Hacienda Business Park without addressing the needs for parking and park <br /> facilities. The community park site that was being looked at previously isn't available and no <br /> provision has been made for a neighborhood park. He felt the park issue should be resolved <br /> before any modifications or approvals are made. He felt this type of community isolates families <br /> from each other and puts them behind garages. He could support single family homes but felt <br /> too many homes are being squeezed into this project without adequate parking. He encouraged <br /> a redesign be made and asked for the project not to be approved. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis stated the five acre neighborhood park would not be adequate for the housing <br /> in the Business Park. The twenty acre park would seem to be the minimum needed to <br /> adequately take care of the recreational needs of that community. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta indicated a report on the proposed neighborhood parks is planned for the <br />-- 1/16/96 agenda and the consideration of a community park is still open, pending analysis in <br /> February. <br /> <br /> 01/02/96 -16- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.