My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN052097
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
CCMIN052097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:36 AM
Creation date
5/10/1999 5:42:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/20/1997
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
He asked if there were split views on the density or is the neighborhood consistent in that it <br />wants rural density. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum said after talking to people it seemed to be consistent. However, people <br />seemed to be hesitant about the annexation for reasons that were unclear. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvet asked for public testimony. <br /> <br /> Michael Faber, 833 Abbie Street, said he recently purchased four acres in the middle of <br />the Remen Tract. He came to the City and asked to be hooked up to the city sewer system and <br />was told the cost to do this would be $32,000 to extend the main sewer line approximately 150 <br />feet. (Using colored charts he showed Council parcels of the Remen Tract that were already <br />annexed to the City and what parcels were not.) He said he spent over $100,000 renovating <br />the houses and upgrading the neighborhood. Most of the Remen Tract was already being <br />serviced by water and sewer. The existing sewer line would be able to handle the area he <br />wanted to develop at no cost to the City. In regards to the water issue, all the residents in the <br />Remen Tract are paying the same water rates as everyone else in Pleasanton. He felt the City <br />has an obligation to upgrade the water lines that these people have been paying for since 1971. <br />In regard to the roads, asphalt shavings were put down on the roads to keep the rural effect. <br />His objective is to hook up to the city sewer. City staff came out and looked at the situation and <br />agreed the parcels should be hooked up to City sewer. He believes the City is afraid of setting <br />a precedent by allowing these parcels to hook up to the sewer, but he believed there were <br />reasons that this was not setting a precedent. Some of those reasons are: the main city sewer <br />line runs directly on his parcel of land; he is not subdividing his parcel, there will be two houses <br />per two acres; and the parcels are surrounded by the City of Pleasanton. He said in order to <br />develop these parcels in the County two septic tanks would have to be put in. This would be <br />a waste of money because eventually these two parcels will be annexed into the City. <br /> <br /> Rick Hempy, 3568 Vine Street, handed a petition to Council requesting lower density for <br />the Remen Tract. He had a list of what the residents would like: 1) lower density, minimum <br />1/2 acre parcels; 2) Vine Street not to go through; 3) water issues; 4) the City to put in the <br />sewer line and residents to pay for the laterals to hook up; 5) retain privately owned streets with <br />minor upgrades; 6) keep rural character (barns, etc.); and 7) keep agricultural designation to <br />allow keeping animals. He said he wants to keep the rural atmosphere. Many residents feel <br />now is the time to explore annexation. To be consistent with the existing neighborhood, it <br />makes sense to allow two homes to be built. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked how much of the parcel directly to the north of this parcel was <br />affected by the Arroyo? <br /> <br /> Mr. Hempy said 80-90 percent. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 05/20/97 <br />Minutes 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.