My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060298
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN060298
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
2/11/1999 11:58:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/2/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Noyes said yes. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum said there is no intent to go to the residents and ask them to fund the <br />Mohr/Martin demonstration project. The residents would be surveyed for funding future <br />projects. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the demonstration project could be phased so that the <br />implementation could be done on a limited basis? She wanted the residents to see the effect of <br />the devices before a considerable money is spent on the whole program. <br /> <br /> Ms. Noyes said part of what makes the devices work is the visual effect. A scaled back <br />version is a less expensive approach but would still give the residents a full visual effect to <br />appreciate what the devices can do. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the plan is implemented the way it is proposed, could there be <br />additional enhancements added, if it was desired? <br /> <br /> Mr. vanGelder said the program is proposed to implement things on a small scale that <br />would appeal to the neighborhoods. If there is strong neighborhood support, then the full <br />program would be implemented. He hoped during the demonstration mode Council would elect <br />to leave room for changes. But once the program is implemented it would be better to leave it <br />alone so the community can adjust to the devices. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if it would make sense to ask for financial support, even though this is <br />a pilot program, because the residents would have to pay for the future programs. <br /> <br /> Mr. h~m said the question was asked and the response was negative. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico said part of the reason for having a demonstration program is that this is <br />relatively new. Once the residents see how it works, they might feel differently. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked why the demonstration neighborhood was not implementing level 1 first. <br /> <br /> Mr. vanGelder said all the normal steps for level 1 had been implemented for the <br />demonstration area. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said the people who happen to be in the neighborhood, but may be outside <br />the immediate area, should have some way of voicing their opinions. <br /> <br /> Mr. vanGelder said he heard from several residents: one who felt the speed limit on <br />Mohr should be raised to 35 mph; others commented that they thought they would have to <br />finance the program 100%; and others who supported the program. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 12 6/2/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.