CCMIN120198 - Laserfiche WebLink

this type of business. Her own personal experience was these uses do create a negative impact. The background of these businesses is unknown. If this was an allowed use it would be a deterrent to more families in coming here. She strongly urged Council not to vote for a zone change. Leave the use in the current zoning areas. She would also like the businesses regulated, the backgrounds checked, the applicants finger-printed and kept away from the children. Mayor Tarver said he just took an oath to defend the constitution and this is the issue that is being discussed here tonight. He asked that the comments be addressed to what would satisfy the community in permitting this type of use and still take care of the community's concerns. Brent Lokker, 4457 Fairlands Drive, believed that First Amendment rights for extrasensory consulting have been provided by access into industrial zones. He also believed the community had the right to say no more and asked Council to exercise this right. He read passages from the Bible. He believed if these uses were allowed the ramifications would be beyond imagination. He asked the Mayor to stick with the current zoning and if this is taken to court he and others would stand up for the community. Amel Whitaker, 5766F Monaco Drive, said he is a mental health professional and frequently, when families reach a point of great distress, they are very vulnerable and look for help in alternative health professions. He said there is no scientific evidence that any of the theories behind extrasensory consulting. Mental health professionals have to go through training and become licensed. Extrasensory consulting is not necessarily a spiritual or religious business. He would like the zoning to remain as it is currently. Geoff Cooper, 7534 Flagstone, did not want to see this type of business in the downtown area. He felt this use does not fall under a religious use. He said the people that operate this kind of business are in it to make money. He suggested looking at the recommendations for gun stores. He said the City had no problem passing a firearms ordinance prohibiting the sale of firearms in certain areas. This ordinance should be treated the same. He saw no problem in prohibiting this type of business in certain areas. In regards to the free speech issue, no one is saying the business owners cannot advertise or contact the newspapers. He just does not want to see extrasensory consultants operating in the downtown area. Beth Fredricksen, 7920 Driftwood Way, said she loves living in Pleasanton. She is familiar with the environment that surrounds psychics and does not want that environment in Pleasanton. She asked about the adult entertainment only issue. She recognized Ms. Dennis's comment in response to her question. But she had other concerns. Why does the disclosure need to appear with the phone number and how would that requirement be relevant to the business requesting the ordinance change? If advertisement on television tells the young people that they cannot call because it is for adults only, what effect will the psychic business have on the curious school children? What protection or safeguards are to protect the young people from going to these places without parental permission? She suggested keeping the ordinance the way Pleasanton City Council 23 12/01/98 Minutes