My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN120198
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN120198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
2/3/1999 7:05:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/1/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Tarver asked when the Growth Management report would be available for <br />Council's review. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swirl said in January. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked when the report was due. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swirl said in September. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked how many units are outstanding that are in the first-come, first- <br />served category. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swirl said there are three units for the calendar year 1998 and the schedule for 1999 <br />allocates 100 units. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked how many units are eligible to pull permits out of the 100 allocated <br />in the first-come, first-served category for 1999. The DeSilva Group would like 35 units. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swirl said he did not know, but technically there are at least 400 units in Ruby Hill. <br /> Ms. Dennis asked what is the School District's preference for the school condition. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush said the City contacted the School District regarding the timing of the building <br />permits relative to the award of construction contracts for the buildings themselves, as opposed <br />to the award of contracts for grading and other preparation of the site. The School District did <br />not express a preference to any of these conditions. The School District has presented a will <br />serve letter stating the School District's position is that the children from this development can <br />be accommodated on a District wide basis. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said the City worked with the School District to draft the conditions that are <br />before Council tonight. The School District is comfortable that it can accommodate the children. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala felt part of the dilemma, particularly with passage of Proposition 1A, is that <br />the City cannot say much about the schools in the area. She said the community needs the <br />elementary school with or without this project by the fall of 2000. She is committed to working <br />with the School District so that a new school becomes a reality and felt by working together it <br />would become a reality. This project does not require the new elementary school but the school <br />is needed in general. She was willing to go with Condition No. 3. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said when the City had a joint meeting with the School District it was <br />mentioned that the new middle school would start construction in the spring of 1999 and would <br />be ready for occupancy by the fall of 2000. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 12/01/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.