Laserfiche WebLink
<br />_ Imagine! 1 <br /> <br />q-15~1~ <br />Q~'~ <br /> <br />: Imagine a city situated at the crossroads of two major Interstate freeways, in a region whose population is <br />exploding, whose General Plan is so hopelessly out of date that it insists that all but two intersections will be <br />maintained within the City's level of service standards at buildout? <br /> <br />Imagine the City's Staff spending tens of thousands of dollars to conduct the Cut-Through Traffic Study in <br />March 1998, and coming to the same rosy conclusion as the flawed General Plan, that only two intersections fail <br />level of service standards at buildout? <br /> <br />Imagine the Staff coming back five months later seeking approval of their Baseline Traffic Report, the basis from <br />which all future traffic reports on proposed development in the city will be created, and telling the city that in <br />reality, 25 Pleasanton intersections will fail level of service standards at buildout? <br /> <br />Imagine a City Council being asked to approve the Baseline Traffic Report, a clear violation of the General <br />Plan's level of service standards, when it contains no explanation of why there is such a huge increase from 2 <br />intersections failing level of service standards at buildout in March, to 25 intersections failing level of service <br />standards at buildout in August? <br /> <br />Consider the fact that the Staff assumes that the city will be able to put all the traffic it wants to onto the <br />freeways at buildout and that 25 intersections still fail level of service standards. Imagine how many <br />_) intersections will actually fail level of service standards if there isn't unlimited Freeway Capacity? <br /> <br />, Imagine a City Council being asked to approve the Baseline Traffic Report when it contains none of the findings <br />of the their West Las Positas Interchange Community Advisory Committee, a bipartisan workgroup consisting of <br />members representing all of the city's stakeholders? A committee who has spent hundreds of thousands of city <br />dollars in it's effort to reach consensus on major issues that contradict the "best case" Freeway Capacity <br />assumptions, the very basis of the Baseline Traffic Report. <br /> <br />Imagine a City Council being asked to approve the Baseline Traffic Report when it ignores the Council's concern <br />about the lack of Freeway Capacity? A concern the Council voiced on May 21, 1998 at their workshop when <br />they directed the West Las Positas Community Advisory Committee to spend hundreds of thousands of <br />additional city dollars to develop a Project Study Report to answer the question of Freeway Capacity. <br /> <br />Imagine a City Council being asked to approve the Baseline Traffic Report when it ignores the Council's believe <br />that Trip Reduction will be required under all scenarios? A concept they approved on May 21, 1998 when they <br />authorized one hundred thousand dollars for the formation of the Joint Transportation Task Force to study Trip <br />Reduction. <br /> <br />Imagine a City Council being asked to approve the Baseline Traffic Report when they realize that Staff failed to <br />inform them that they still have a lot of control over decisions about reduced density in the city. That Staff said <br />nothing about this during the May 21, 1998 workshop when the Council agreed with the finding of their <br />Community Advisory Committee that "development agreements for most undeveloped parcels are too far along <br />.,,-..... to affect major change. II <br /> <br />I Format ideas courtesy of our friends at Ponderosa Homes <br />