Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Tarver indicated City Hall, the Community Center, the Gymnasium, and the <br />Operations Service Center. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said Council could choose to pull certain projects. She indicated that if <br />money is not set aside for certain projects, the City ends up paying twice or three times. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said the Community Park for the San Francisco property is budgeted for <br />2001 and 2002. His time frame is 1999 or 2000. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said the time frame is based on the additional 9.5 acres. This is based on <br />the time line for the San Francisco property. She indicated grading would not even begin until <br />the year 2000. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said the initial 20 acres would be funded and developed. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said his desire is to have the money available. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked who owned the land that the City wanted to purchase for the Operation <br />Service Center. Is this land owned by Ponderosa? <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta said Ponderosa has an option on the property. The details would have to be <br />worked out in regards to the property owners interest. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico felt many people would be upset if the City paid Ponderosa Homes $825,000 <br />for that property a this time. He preferred that money to be added to the park renovation fund <br />or into an unallocated fund and then to the Park and Recreation Commission for priorities on <br />how to spend the money. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver indicated that if the money is given to the Park and Recreation <br />Commission that no limitations be set on its prioritizing. He then referred to the replacement <br />fund for the Police and Finance computer systems and wanted that replacement done faster than <br />ten years. <br /> <br /> Ms. Rossi said the City is not proposing to replace the financial system because the City <br />does not have a year 2000 compliance problem. Eventually a new system will need to be <br />purchased and therefore it was decided to start setting money aside. The park renovation fund <br />was based on a time line as to when to renovate parks and trails. She reminded Council that <br />there is $500,000 in the renovation account that has been set aside each year but is not indicated <br />in the report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti gave a brief history in regards to how the CIP projects are determined. <br />It seemed appropriate to her that when the City has one time funds, then unfunded projects <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 4 06/30/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />