Laserfiche WebLink
Katrik Patel, architect for the appellants, thanked Council and staff for working with him. <br />He said he has met every requirement except for the 4500 sq.ft. limitation. The reason the <br />additional square footage is necessary is because there will be three generations of the family <br />living in this house. He presented a model and showed transparencies of the proposed house. <br />He said the exposure to Foothill would be limited. He believed that persons in cars traveling <br />on Foothill would not be able to see the house but would see the house that is being developed <br />in the second tier. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if the appellants had the opportunity to buy a lot on the second tier? <br /> <br /> Mr. Patel said the buyers had put a down payment on a second tier lot but something <br />happened and they were unable to obtain the lot. He said there were two things he wanted to <br />accomplish today: To get approval for the extra square footage and to change the house color <br />to a lighter color. He said one of the requirements is that the entrance has to face Foothill Road <br />and the garages had to be shielded from Foothill and Serenity Court. He has met these <br />requirements and believed the house, except for one comer, would not be visible from Foothill <br />Road. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked how many square feet the garage would be? <br /> <br /> Mr. Patel said approximately 1900 sq. ft. For this house there would be a minimum of <br />six cars and he felt residents in the development would want the cars out of sight. He would <br />be happy to reduce the garage size if that is the decision of the Council. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked him to point out on the model where the garage was located? <br /> Mr. Patel said the entrance to the garage is from Serenity Court. <br /> <br /> David Glenn, 10 Tehan Canyon Road, said he did not live very far from the proposed <br />development. He said many of the conditions cited in the report are not practical. First the <br />house is limited to 4500 sq.ft., but the house adjacent to it is 5600 sq.ft. and there is a wide <br />drainage ditch between the two house that exposes both houses to Foothill Road. He said staff <br />is recommending reducing the driveway from 16 ft. to 12 ft. and 12 feet is not wide enough to <br />allow two cars to pass or sit side by side. He felt certain conditions were not practical, such <br />as #24, that no material shall be stored at the site, the street should be brushed during <br />construction; and concerning construction access routes. He reiterated again that a twelve foot <br />driveway would not be wide enough. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said the driveway issue had been resolved and would be left at sixteen <br />feet. <br /> <br /> Mr. Glenn believed a 10% increase in square footage was not that significant. <br /> <br /> Peggy Purnell, 2472 Via De Los Milagras, felt Moller Ranch was the most disgusting <br />development ever approved. She has been trying to keep houses off the ridge for quite some <br />time. She said Moller Ranch is visible not only from Foothill Road but from everywhere in <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 7 4/21/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />