My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN021798
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN021798
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
2/3/1999 3:53:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Pico did not support asphalt sidewalks because of the high maintenance involved. <br /> <br />Item 6b <br />Proposed Zone 7 Water Service expansion policy <br /> <br />This item was continued to March 3, 1998. <br /> <br />Item 6c <br />Approval of Alameda Count_v ExpenditUre Plan and recommendation to the Board of <br />Supervisors to place an extension Of the sale~ tax on the baH0t. (SR98:42) <br /> <br /> Randall Lum presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Christine Monsen, Transportation Authority Director, said she needed the majority of the <br />affected cities to approve the plan so the Board of Supervisors could consider puffing the <br />measure on the June ballot. It will be a continuation of the 1/2 cent sales tax that is in existence <br />now and would start being collected in the year 2000. She was here to ask Council to approve <br />the expenditure plan and to request that the Board of Supervisors place it on the June ballot. <br />There measure must be approved by a 2/3 majority of the voters for the tax to take affect. A <br />new agency will be formed to administer the continued sales tax, which will be similar to the <br />existing Board. A new component to this expenditure plan is that a citizens' watchdog <br />committee will be formed to oversee all the financial transactions of the new agency that will <br />report directly to the public. She urged the Council to support the plan. She felt it would be <br />a benefit to the City. She mentioned that the ACTA Board would be considering this month a <br />revised project description for the BART rail extension to Warm Springs, to clarify that BART <br />is the project sponsor and has until the year 2000 to secure funding. If it cannot secure funding, <br />it could ask for one year extensions. In addition, the City of Fremont has asked for the title for <br />the project be changed to BART Warm Springs extension to clarify that the intent really is to <br />build the Warm Springs extension. She asked Council to approve the revisions as well. She <br />said part of what the Board will consider was how many cities have endorsed the revision. <br />BART, as a project sponsor, came forth. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if Highway 84 was a sponsored road. <br /> <br /> Ms. Monsen said the City of Livermore was sponsoring Highway 84. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said that when Measure B was adopted, it was intended that Pigeon Pass <br />would be a four lane road. Is this still correct? <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 2/17/98 <br />Minutes 28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.