Laserfiche WebLink
Gary Schwaegerle, 189 W. Angela Street, mentioned several incidents where criminals <br />were scared off or caught because of handguns. He felt there were enough laws and to just <br />enforce the ones Pleasanton already had. He was concerned about the erosion of personal <br />freedom. <br /> <br /> Christopher Olson, 4304-A Valley Avenue, opposed the two ordinances. He said the <br />body of evidence available did not support the conclusion that gun control would prevent violent <br />crimes. He mentioned states that allowed weapons to be carried around actually had reduced <br />crime rates. He mentioned many studies that proved gun control did not control crime and <br />believed the propaganda was misleading the public. <br /> <br /> David Keegan, 3327 Cashdar Court, said he was looking for a statement from the police <br />chief in the staff report in regards to the effect this law would have. He could f'md no evidence <br />that this law would have any impact on crime or violence. He said he has never heard of any <br />crime happening at gun shows. He also mentioned that the free legal help being offered cost <br />the County of Santa Clara $250,000. He wanted to save the children's right to buy and own <br />firearms when they came of age. <br /> <br /> Jeanne Foster, 375 Sycamore Road, said she opposed the ordinances. She believed this <br />kind of law was only to control law-abiding citizens with whom there was no current or past <br />problems. The criminal activities would still happen, because criminals do not get their guns <br />legally. She realized this ordinance did not affect the gun shows but felt it would give the <br />County ammunition to eventually close down the gun shows. As a gun show promoter she felt <br />the Pleasanton gun show was one of the nicest ones around. She mentioned the gun show <br />exhibited other things with the guns. She urged the Council not to adopt the ordinances. <br /> <br /> Hass Bozorgzad, 6546 Arlington Drive, appealed to everyone to use their common sense. <br />He had read the report and found nothing in the report that told him he could not purchase a gun <br />or that it was infringing on anybody's Constitutional right. He agreed with putting safety issues <br />on the purchase of guns and regulating where people could buy the guns. <br /> <br /> There being no further public testimony, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked how many handguns were sold by residential dealers? <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush said in 1996 seventeen handguns were sold by three of the licensed dealers <br />in Pleasanton and in 1997 ten handguns were sold by two of the licensed dealers. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked how many were sold to Pleasanton residents? <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush said in 1996 one handgun was sold to a Pleasanton residence and another <br />Pleasanton resident bought a handgun through a private party transfer. In 1997 of the ten <br />handguns sold, only one was sold to a Pleasanton resident. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 15 02/09/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />