My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN072198
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN072198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
10/29/1998 5:31:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/21/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
also like to see any reverse osmosis project be put to a vote as well. He encouraged attendance <br /> at the Zone 7 meeting. <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br />Item 6a(1) <br />Placing on the November 1998 ballot whether Pleasanton should participate in the <br />LAVWMA expansion project. (SR98: 197) <br /> <br />Item 6a(2) <br />Consideration of placing on the November 1998 Ballot whether (1) to eliminate the City <br />Treasurer as an elected position, (2) the term for Mayor should be four rather than two <br />years and (3) vacancies for council positions should be filled by an election rather than by <br />appointment. (SR98: 191) <br /> <br />Item 6a(3) <br />Resolutions (A) requesting consolidation with Statewide General Election and establishira, <br />various procedures for November 3, 1998 Municipal election and (B) submitting various <br />measures to the voters of Pleasanton. (SR98: 191) <br /> <br /> Randall Lum presented the staff report for Item 6a(1). <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the ballot language states what we want to do; that is, if it is not <br />possible to reline the pipeline, can we go forward with a single pipeline? She had no problem <br />with everything coming back to a vote, but wanted to keep this simple yet allow LAVWMA to <br />do what was necessary. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver believed that this wording provides flexibility for the agreements made <br />under the Principles of Agreement. That referred to dry weather flow, service area, and export <br />pipeline capacity. Those are the fundamental principles that are the basis of the agreement. <br />This wording provides for the possibility for the LAVWMA Board to come up with another <br />alternative as long as the principles are adhered to. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum said that was correct. So long as export capacity or the area served is not <br />increased, the change to a single pipeline could occur without submitting the matter to the <br />voters; however it would require unanimous agreement among the members of the Agency. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver explained that Livermore believes this wording protects against expansion <br />beyond what has been planned for in the General Plans of the cities. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 5 07/21/98 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.