My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN052198
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CCMIN052198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:27 AM
Creation date
10/29/1998 5:28:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/1998
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Gill agreed. Any plan or program will depend upon what is already envisioned by <br />the General Plan. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala said Pleasanton has BART and the Altamont Commuter Rail is coming. <br />Perhaps a model could be made for all the communities to use as a reference. <br /> <br /> Mr. Gill said the businesses community is taking a lead in trip reduction programs. The <br />businesses realize traffic needs to be reduced to ensure continued development of the area. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala was impressed with the committees work and looked forward to being a model <br />for the Tri-Valley area. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver said after the project study reports are done Council will have the best <br />information available to make a decision, but not all the information will be available. <br /> <br /> Joe Callahan, 5674 Stoneridge Dr, Suite 212, said during the Northe Pleasanton <br />Improvement District process Hacienda had to go through a federal highway administration <br />document for a new connection at Hacienda and 1-580 and much of that documentation is before <br />Council tonight. The General Plan that was adopted in 1986 worked off a buildout of the Tri- <br />Valley area, that said at buildout there would be 350,000 residents and 225,000 employees. <br />During the NPID environmental process most of the same issues were looked at, such as the <br />design of 1-580 from Santa Rita to 1-680 interchange. He felt the numbers projected trips will <br />not be found in the land use data. He said it is common practice to limit the movement at a <br />freeway regional interchange. He believed the position to take out the West Las Positas/I-680 <br />interchange is because it dumps into the neighborhoods. In closing, he reiterated these issues <br />have been looked at in the past and that the General Plan addresses the issues. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if he felt the reports that had been done in the 80' s reflected todays <br />reality. <br /> <br /> Mr. Callahan said the five cent increase in the gas tax in 1986 to help fund immediate <br />improvements to Highway 84 is not the same. Caltrans did a project study report on Highway <br />84 in 1984 that stated the highway could be improved for $60 million; those same improvements <br />today would cost $120 million. In 1984 there were 24,000 trips on Highway 84, where today <br />there is approximately 28,000 trips. If Highway 84 is improved, it would basically bring 1- <br />580/I-680 to 1980 traffic levels. <br /> <br /> Matt Sullivan, 4324 Muirwood Drive, said this committee really opened his eyes <br />regarding the potential for trip reductions and what the programs can offer. He said most of <br />what has been discussed will not happen for ten to fifteen years. The situation and area will <br />change drastically in the next ten to fifteen years. He felt moving forward on planning the <br />transportation future of Pleasanton was a good idea. He urged Council to keep the committee <br />moving forward. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 05/21/98 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.