My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 88298
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
RES 88298
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2012 1:09:09 PM
Creation date
12/3/1999 12:12:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/21/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As a member of the Hazardous Materials Subcommittee, the <br />City's Chemical specialist concurs with the opinion of that <br />committee that "Good" does not necessarily mean "Safe" and <br />that a finding made by the appropriate agencies (Highway <br />Patrol, Calif. Dept. of Transportation, etc.) be added to the <br />inclusionary criteria that a facilities access roadway is <br />safe and does not constitute a danger to the public or <br />environment from heavy truck traffic. <br /> <br />Planning staff feels that the intent of such a finding is <br />already addressed in the CHWMP in the conditional criteria. <br />The purpose of the inclusionary criteria is to pinpoint <br />potential sites. Risk analysis and "weeding out" of sites <br />takes place when the exclusionary and conditional criteria <br />are applied. If performance standards are applied too early <br />in the siting process, many potential sites in populated <br />areas, near waste generators, may be unnecessarily <br />eliminated. This could result in facilities moving farther <br />and farther away from source production, and would mean more <br />transportation of waste, potentially through Pleasanton. <br />Staff believes the siting criteria must remain "loose" enough <br />to allow siting facilities along the 1-880, I-S0 corridor. <br /> <br />Groundwater <br /> <br />There has also been some discussion between agencies <br />reviewing the Plan as to whether or not groundwater criteria <br />should be exclusionary for transfer, treatment, and <br />incineration facilities as it is for residual repositories. <br />The feeling is that although residual repositories by design <br />are at greater risk to leak waste directly into the ground, <br />spills are equally as likely to take place at other types of <br />facilities. Once a spilled hazardous substance enters the <br />groundwater, there may be no reclamation. <br /> <br />Again, Planning staff believes that too many potential sites <br />may be eliminated if this criteria were made exclusionary <br />rather than conditional. A good portion of west Alameda <br />County lies over and relies on groundwater resources. This <br />is also where the the bulk of waste generators are located. <br />The City of Pleasanton would again face the possibility that <br />hazardous waste facilities would be required to locate <br />farther away from the sources of waste, making it necessary <br />for more waste to travel by way of the City's highways. <br /> <br />SR:88:299 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.