My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 88224
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
RES 88224
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2012 4:44:10 PM
Creation date
12/2/1999 12:26:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. LcuKitzhin <br />April 21, 1988 <br />Page Three <br /> <br /> This is prubably the most difficult part of the project <br /> by virtue of the fact that there is so much competition for <br /> available funds. Another area that m~t be explored has to <br /> do with legislation that I personally was responsible for and <br /> was passed ara si_gr~a___ last year, and is now being used in a <br /> couple of major counties in the state, which provides for any <br /> other sourues of funding, both local ~DVe%TmB~t aUXt private, <br /> <br /> STIP, and under a ccrfcrac~] a~x/ement that source of <br /> funding will be ze/mbursed at such time as the STIP funding <br /> ~ available. STIP furfling c~es not c~ly frce the <br /> state funds, but frum federal furas also as they may frum <br /> time to time come thruugh t~his federal highway prog--rum. <br /> <br /> The state is alloted a general sum of money each year, <br /> and it is divided by counties according to populatic~ and <br /> vehicle registration, and these are known as discretionary <br /> <br /> there is a considerable amount of leeway that is provided, <br /> and it would be necessary to work with the county government <br /> and Transportation Plann/r~ ~/ency in Alame~_a County in order <br /> to attempt to invade any of these funds. However, this is a <br /> possibility. <br /> <br /> existing capital funds on hand hut not planned to be used in <br /> the next five years. An euemple of such might be for a <br /> transit authority in the cemty who would make the funds <br /> available and be entitled to an assignment of the pay-back <br /> from the STIP monies when they became available under the law <br /> pk-eviously mentioned above. We have recently made a signif- <br /> icant Cement of this type in the range of $100 million <br /> for Orange Omlnty, the funds to come frc~ private developers <br /> <br /> joint powers arrangemn~ who receive benefit ~ <br /> <br /> In recognition of the fact that we have some funding <br /> available, the first ]]mm~]iate ~-~k will be to attempt to <br /> <br /> selling Caltrans on the efficacy of the project f-~ the <br /> standpoint of its timing, and in order to aocu~plish this, <br /> which I would consider to be cur first and most important <br /> <br /> using whatever local political sources and legislative input <br /> that this is a viable project, an important project, and one <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.