17 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

9. Impact on the Movement of Any Species (pp. 110, 120 and 359/360; Condition 9f of PUD-33; MMIP D9). a. Potentiallmpact. The Original Project's potential impacts on CTS and CRLF movement to offsite breeding habitat from direct mortality are discussed in the DEIR at page 110 and the Environmentally Superior Project's impacts are discussed at page 360. b. Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented as provided for in the Mitigation Monitoring and Implementation Program: • Implement Oak Grove Planned Unit Development (PUD-33) Mitigation Measure D9. c. Findings. Based on the EIR and the entire record before the City, the City finds that: (i) Effects of Mitigation. The Environmentally Superior Project's potential impacts on CTS and CRLF movement to off-site breeding habitat from direct mortality will be mitigated to less than significant levels through the implementation of the mitigation measure which requires construction of Hearst Drive wildlife crossing features. These features are described in Mitigation Measures D1 and D2 and, the Environmentally Superior Project, as conditioned, will be required to be submitted to the Planning Director and the City Engineer for review and approval before the City's action on the first final subdivision map. (ii) Remaining Impacts. Any remaining impacts related to impacts to CTS and CRLF movement to offsite breeding habitat will be less than significant. 10. Conflict with the Protection of Biological Resources (pp. 111, 120-121 and 359/360; Condufion 51-57 of PUD-33; MMIP D 10). a. Potentiallmpact. The Original Project's potential impacts due to the removal of up to 90 Heritage trees and impacts on an additional 44 Heritage trees are discussed in the DEIR at page 111 and the Environmentally Superior Project's impacts on 32 Heritage Trees are discussed at page 360. Page 22 of 43