My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
090407
>
17 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2007 5:17:02 PM
Creation date
8/30/2007 5:16:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/4/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Whether the proposed development plan is compatible with the natural, <br />topographic features of the site: <br />• The proposed development plan is designed to reflect the site's existing <br />topographic condition, to minimize impacts on adjoining properties, to be <br />consistent with the requirements and geotechnical report recommendations <br />that have been prepared for the proposed project, and to minimize grading. <br />• The location and configuration of the proposed lots and public streets <br />generally follow natural contours. <br />• Most private lots will be designed to drain to bio-retention areas designed to <br />pretreat stormwater runoff before entering the City's storm drain system. <br />• The proposed lots and streets are located in the most geologic stable areas of <br />the site avoiding landslide areas and reducing the project's grading. All <br />grading will be primarily done to a minimum 3:1 slope banks and will feature a <br />variety of greater slopes to match existing terrain. Remaining lot grading will <br />be reviewed in conjunction with the site-specific building design applications. <br />Staff believes that the development's proposed grading has done a good job of <br />balancing the requirements of being sensitive to the site and adjoining properties <br />as well as proposing grading that is needed to create the proposed development. <br />Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br />4. Whether grading in conjunction with the proposed development plan takes <br />into account environmental characteristics and is designed in keeping with <br />the best engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or flooding, and to <br />have as minimal an effect upon the environment as possible. <br />• Requirements of the Uniform Building Code -implemented by the City at the <br />Building Permit review -would ensure that building foundations and private <br />street/on-site parking/driveway areas are constructed on satisfactorily <br />compacted fill. <br />• Erosion control and dust suppression measures will be documented in the <br />final subdivision map and will be administered by the City's Building and <br />Public Works Departments. <br />• Initial grading will be necessary to accommodate the proposed public streets <br />and the front-yard portions of the lots. The front-yard portion of the lot will <br />then be contour-graded and "feathered" to existing terrain. All grading will be <br />done to a minimum 3:1 slope banks and will feature a variety of greater <br />slopes to match existing terrain. Remaining lot grading will be reviewed in <br />conjunction with the site-specific building design applications. <br />• With few exceptions, the lots will be designed to drain to the retention basins <br />shown on the site plan to pretreat the runoff before its entry into the City's <br />storm drain system. In addition to the retention basins, additional stormwater <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.