01 - Laserfiche WebLink

with a broad development that included a 37-acre auto mall, 45-acre senior continuum care community, a 12-acre retail commercial site and the 17-acre community park. In April of 2006 the Council approved the MOU which established a road map. Staff indicated they would go through a planning process. He presented a diagram which was included in the MOU of the planning area, said the 17-acre site was large and represented the fourth largest park in the City. The Council will discuss tonight a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission for putting an ice-skating facility on the site and even given this, the remaining part of the parcel not dedicated to the rink would still be regarded as the eighth largest park in the City. In October of 2006 San Jose Area Management, who are affiliated with the San Jose Sharks, approached the City with an interest in putting in an ice-skating facility on the park site. They estimated it would require ±8 acres and their vision would be a joint public/private venture. He said their initial concept was for a full service ice rink, a lobby, restaurant, restrooms, pro-shop, conference room, rental areas and they proposed a whole range of activities within the building including open skating, skating programs for youth and adults, high school hockey programs, hockey schools camp, figure skating instruction, regular instruction, and a very complete operation that would intend to meet the needs of residents as well as immediate regional needs. Council provided feedback and indicated that prior to taking any action on the matter that it be reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission to ensure a public review process, identify potential uses, community interest, and recommend whether the use would be a good fit for the site. Staff determined that the project could be benefited from professional consulting services, and Wayne Rasmussen was hired to conduct the process. Jim Wolfe, Director of Parks and Recreation said the Park and Recreation Commission elected to conduct a 4-part process in reviewing the matter. In February the Commission met in with Wayne Rasmussen to discuss how the process would work and input would be gathered. Two workshops were conducted in March to receive input from stakeholders and interested residents about types of amenities they would like to see on the site, and in April, to present two options. There was one modification based on the plan and rather than make the decision at the workshop, they provided more opportunity for public input, the Commission heard the matter at their regular April meeting and prepared the recommendations which were before the Council. He further pointed out that the concept plans were not a master plan. Wayne Rasmussen of Rasmussen Planning, Inc., said the process began with the preparation of an opportunities and constraints map which he presented, and in order to inform the Commission as to the site characteristics they conducted a noise evaluation, looked at wind, views, tree locations, and the surroundings of the park and its proximity to the Chain of Lakes. He further indicated at the second and third workshops, input was received from the public regarding uses. The Commission was able to accommodate most uses in the plan to be presented and of the uses two all-weather lighted fields for soccer/football/Lacrosse, afour-rink ice skating facility, six lighted tennis courts, bocce courts, a dog exercise area, lawn bowling area, passive open space, trails, restrooms and parking were identified. During the time surrounding the second Commission meeting the County Surplus Property Authority had been working on plans for the Specific Plan area and they made a suggestion that the City reconsider the configuration of the park from rectangular to an City Council Minutes 8 July 17, 2007