RES 89175 - Laserfiche WebLink

SR 89:133 Page 10 Staff Recommendation The staff has presented three policy options to allow your Council to exercise control of development based upon the most accurate, timely information which depicts current and short-range projections rather than just a long range, most conservative, maximum occupancy condition. The first policy option is recommended if your Council wishes to allow North Pleasanton to continue development. The third option is recommended if your Council wishes to take a more conservative approach. This allows more time to analyze and develop additional mitigating measures. The second option is recommended if your Council believes that the average occupancy and density conditions which exited just prior to the new AT&T Headquarters move are representative of what we may see two years into the future. This option allows some but not all of the development that staff understands is being proposed in 1989. Staff recommends a 90% building occupancy rate for policy option 1), a 95% occupancy rate for policy option 2), and a 100% occupancy rate for policy option 3). No matter what action is taken with respect to the above options, staff recommends modifying the commercial rates to reflect the ITE pass-by adjustments. Respectfully submitted, ~t R. Walker Director of Public Works City Manager and Utilities ATTACHMENTS: 1. NPID Committee Data 2. Figure i - 1988 Driveway Study Building Square Footage 3. Figure 2 - 1988 Driveway Study - P.M. Peak Hour Vehicles 4. Figure 3 - 1988 Driveway Study - Driveway Count Locations 5. Figure 4 - Commercial Project "Pass-by" Trip Reduction 6. Figure 5a & 5b - Effect of Trip Generation Rates on Hopyard @ Owens LOS 7. Table 2 - (Table IV-1 Common Land Use Densities, ITE) 8. Table 3 - 1988 Driveway Study Locations 9. Table 4 - Adopted and Optional Trip Generation Rates