My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 89175
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
RES 89175
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2012 4:56:58 PM
Creation date
11/30/1999 12:17:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/4/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SR 89:133 <br /> Page 9 <br /> <br />The graphics shown in Figure 5 show the relative effect. The <br />intersection of Hopyard Road and Owens Drive is operating at LOS <br />"B" with existing volume. When the generated traffic using a trip <br />generation rate of 2.0 trips per 1,000 sq. ft. is added from <br />"Existing plus Approved" buildings, the v/c ratio goes above LOS <br />"D" to a v/c of 0.91. <br /> <br />The generated traffic is about 32% of the capacity. When a trip <br />generation rate of 1.65 trips per thousand sq. ft. is used instead <br />of 2.0, the v/c ratio drops to 0.88. A rate of 1.33 (Option 2), <br />will drop the v/c to 0.87. <br /> <br />Policy ODtiOnS <br /> <br />The policy options regarding the "Office" PM rate of trips <br />generated per 1,000 sq. ft. of occupied space are: <br /> <br /> a) Leave the 2.0 trips per 1,000 sq. ft. as is. <br /> b) Reduce the rate to the counted rate for the Driveway Study <br /> buildings, i.e. 1.25/1,000 sq. ft. <br /> c) Reduce it to the factored 1988 TSM rate of 1.33. (this <br /> recognizes the higher trip rate of those other office <br /> buildings in the TSM Survey) <br /> d) Reduce it to the rate in "c" above expanded to account for <br /> a projected increase in employee density to 250 sq. ft. <br /> per employee, i.e., 1.66. <br /> <br />Policy options concerning building occupancy range from 90% to the <br />present 100%. <br /> <br />The options selected are a function of the decision-makers' <br />confidence in the empirical data, in the ability of the City to <br />continue constructing traffic mitigation improvements, and in the <br />economy to lag behind new building construction. It is ultimately <br />a question of what level of risk the decision-maker wishes to <br />tolerate in ensuring the General Plan level of service goals are <br />met in the short term. <br /> <br />Environmental Monitorina Committee & Planninq Commission <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />The Environmental Monitoring Committee and Planning Commission <br />recommended unanimously that the trip generation rates be adjusted <br />to those in Option 2, that the building occupancy be adjusted to <br />95% for "build-out," and to adopt the ITE assumptions for <br />"Commercial" "Pass-by" trips. The Planning Commission also <br />recommended an annual update of trip generation factors. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.