My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16 ATTACHMENT 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
082107
>
16 ATTACHMENT 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2007 11:27:16 AM
Creation date
8/6/2007 3:28:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
16 ATTACHMENT 5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />Page 2-16 <br />No changes. <br />Page 2-17 <br />Commission Pearce: <br />• Delete the phrase "and often misunderstood" from the first sentence under The <br />Relationship of Jobs and Housing to read: "The relationship between jobs and <br />housing is a complex topic...." <br />Page 2-18 <br />Chairperson Fox inquired if Pleasanton, as part of the East County Area Plan (ECAP), is <br />required to comply with County ordinances on land use with respect to inclusionary <br />housing, or if Pleasanton bound solely by its own inclusionary ordinance as an <br />incorporated city. Ms. Stern replied that Pleasanton is not bound by the ECAP policies. <br />Page 2-19 <br />Chairperson Fox <br />• Correct the spelling of "Merrit" on the first line to "Merritt.) <br />Page 2-20 <br />Commissioner Narum noted the inconsistency between the text and Policy 13 regarding <br />the location of mixed-use development in areas served by public transit. She would like <br />the text and policy to be consistent and stated her preference for its location by a public <br />transportation. Ms. Stern stated that the other area where mixed-use development might <br />be considered is the Downtown but it is not labeled thus as the Downtown Specific Plan <br />encourages mix use. <br />• Include the word "preferably" on the fourth line of the Mixed Use paragraph to <br />read: "...to provide additional housing close to jobs, services, and preferably <br />transit...." And in Policy 13 on page 2-30. <br />Chairperson Fox inquired if there were any advantage to having Mixed Use as a land use <br />designation and TOD as another land use designation. Commissioner Pearce stated that <br />would add to the complexity of the map. <br />Commissioner Pearce: <br />• Delete the word "potential" on the second line of the second paragraph under <br />Transit-Oriented Development to read: "...but can also lead to other ~l <br />benefits...." <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 11, 2007Page 14 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.