My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16 ATTACHMENT 2 REDLINE
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
082107
>
16 ATTACHMENT 2 REDLINE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2007 11:27:47 AM
Creation date
8/6/2007 3:18:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
16 ATTACHMENT 2, REDLINE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft 2.0 Land Use Element <br />TABLE 2-3~: GENERAL PLAN DENSITIES <br />Land Use Designation Allowable <br />Density Range Average Density Used <br />for Holding Capacity <br />Rural-Density Residential 0-0.2 du/acre 0.2 du/acre <br />Low-Density Residential 0-2 du/acre 1.0 du/acre <br />Medium-Density Residential 2-8 du/acre 5.0 du/acre <br />High-Density Residential 8+ du/acre 15.0 du/acre <br />Mixed-Use: Residential <br />Commercial 20+ du/acre <br />or 200% FAR Not Applicable ° <br />Commercial/Office 0-60% FAR b 35% FAR <br />General & Limited Industrial 0-50% FAR 31 % FAR <br />Business Park 0-60% FAR 32% FAR <br />Sand and Gravel Harvesting Not Applicable Not applicable <br />Notes: du =dwelling unit(s), FAR =floor area ratio <br />° This will be based on a PUD or Specific Plan. <br />b An FAR of up to 300 percent is allowed in the Downtown Specific Plan area. <br /> <br />In recent vears. as fewer lars?e residential development sites are available and the number. of residential <br />units seeking building per mits is significantly lower than the annual allocation,~reduced in 2004 to 350 <br />units/year there has been less need for a growth management system that acts to meter residential <br />development. In the future, it is anticipated that the overall residential growth rate will decrease as the <br />number of units approaches the 29,000 unit cap (see below). However, there maybe years when large- <br />scale multifamily or mixed use projects near the BART stations or in East Pleasanton compete with <br />smaller projects for residential allocations. In addition, there is an opportunity to incorporate goals of <br />this General Plan such as energy conservation, affordable housing, and sustainability into the allocation <br />process. Future refinements of the Growth Management Program should seek to simplify the system <br />and to incorporate the City Council's priorities. <br />Holding Capacity <br />Holding 6capacity is the ultimate size of the community that the Planning Area ean--l~would <br />accommodated if all land uses shown on the General Plan Map were to be built. Capacity is expressed <br />in terms of housing units, population, commercial/office/industrial building floor area, and jobs at <br />buildout. <br />By 2025~~if all residential land shown on the General Plan Map were built out, Pleasanton would <br />contain a maximum of appre~nately-29,000 housing ttrZits--units, approximately 600 second units, and <br />approximately 1.100 residents in con>?re~ate (eroupl livine faciliries~. These units wlt~ would <br />support a residential population of about ~438~78,200. This 13a ~ population estimate <br />assumes that ,vacancy rates will average <br />LU element 082107 redline 2-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.