My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16 ATTACHMENT 2 REDLINE
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
082107
>
16 ATTACHMENT 2 REDLINE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2007 11:27:47 AM
Creation date
8/6/2007 3:18:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/21/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
16 ATTACHMENT 2, REDLINE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft 2.0 Land Use Element <br />u~___..__.._ ..: -.~ Because this neighborhood is an existing partially developed area, the General Plan <br />allows five-acre minimum parcel sizes tray- without the provision of standard urban water <br />and sewer service, subject to public health and safety considerations. <br />In November 2000, the voters of Alameda County approved an Urban Growth Boundary (Measure D1 <br />which is co-terminus with the city's Urban Growth Boundary in Pleasanton and also includes the <br />Cities of Livermore and Dublin. <br />Residential Cap <br />The 1996 General Plan and a subsequent vote of the citizens of Pleasanton established a residential <br />cap of 29,000 housing units within the Pleasanton Planning Area. By state law, "secondary units" are <br />not counted within this cap Assisted living units are~enerally not counted towards the 29,000 unit <br />can However, in the case of continuing-care communities that include residential units for <br />independent living, a proportion of the units may be counted towards the cap, based on impacts on <br />community services and infrastructure (including traffic impacts, water and sewer impacts, and impacts <br />on parks and schoolsl. <br />In the future, Pleasanton is projected to grow to hold a maximum of app~~tately-29,000 homes. <br />This-#~gttre number assumes buildout of all residential lands shown on the General Plan Map at <br />average densities (see Table 2-43) or consistent with an adopted Specific Plan where applicable. The <br />City's Growth Management Program nd Growth Management Ordinance <br />currently limits annual housing growth to X350 units, ,although actual <br />growth has averaged around 250 units per year since 2001. At this rate, and including the addition of a <br />small number of second units each year, Pleasanton would reach a , <br />population of about ~4,5A~-78 200 in the Planning Area xrern~-in <br />the year 2025'""'x. These projections depend on many factors including the national and local <br />economies, Tri-Valley job growth, household size, average vacancy rate, commute patterns, water <br />supply, wastewater treatment capacity, traffic capacity, air quality, and other factorsete. <br />Growth Management Program <br />The City adopted its first growth management ordinance in 1978, designed to regulate the location and <br />rate of new residential growth in a period of sewage treatment constraints and air quality concerns. <br />The growth management program was modified following the comprehensive revisions to the General <br />Plan in 1986 and 1996. Currently the Growth Management Ordinance: <br />^ Establishes an annual limit for new residential units. <br />^ Requires the apportionment of dearly total new residential units to categories of projects (i.e., <br />affordable projects: major projects: first-come, first-served projects: small projects. <br />^ Defines a process for obtaining an allocation under the program. <br />LU element 082107 redline 2-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.