2382 - Laserfiche WebLink

requires that public improvements be constructed as a continuous project. The TSM and Transit Conditions will achieve a reduction in projected trips, reducing local and regional traffic volume. a.3 Fact. The Project adds incrementally insig- nificant traffic to non-local streets and freeways. a.4 Findin Some of the other mitigation measures identified in the Draft EIR (extension of BART to Tri-Valley, Light Rail Transit and regional transit services) are subject to the jurisdic- tion of other public agencies and can and should be enforced by such agencies. Other mitigation measures affecting local transit are under study by the City. a.5 Fact. BART is subject to the jurisdiction of the MTC; Light Rail Transit is subject to the jurisdiction of MTC; regional freeway improve- ments are subject to the, jurisdiction of Caltrans. These regional traffic and transit measures are currently under study. Both BART and I-680 freeway improvements are projected to be operational prior to year 2005. See, e.g., Livermore-Pleasanton Extension Study, Interim Report No. 1. a.6 Fact. Local transit measures including bus system, Park and Ride Lots, and a City-wide TSM ordinance are currently under study by the City. a.7 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative, No Project Alternative, Increased Residential Capacity Alternative, Partial Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative could partially mitigate the potential signifi- cant traffic effect. However, as described in Section XII, these Alternatives are infeasi- ble. The Alternatives are unnecessary because the mitigation measures which have been incorporated into the Project substantially lessen the effect. a.8 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of these Alternatives). a.9 Fact. See Sections II.a.2, IIa.3 (Traffic Mitigation). 4.