My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2127
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
2127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:34:27 AM
Creation date
7/26/2007 1:44:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/13/1982
DOCUMENT NO
2127
DOCUMENT NAME
GP-81-10
NOTES
CITY OF PLEASANTON
NOTES 2
AMEND GENERAL PLAN, ALLOW FOR MODIFICATIONS TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF CITY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRO44TH MANelGEb1ENT ELEMENT <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Pleasanton has been one of the fastest growing cities in California. <br />The city's population increased from 6,200 in 1965 to 30,350 in <br />1973. The rapid growth was predominantly residential development. <br />Single family subdivisions sprang up quickly throughout the city, <br />scattered from one city boundary to the other as developers built <br />where land was cheap and available. These subdivisions were frequently <br />physically separated from the old city center by agricultural fields <br />passed over in the initial rush to develop. Certain areas were <br />physically separated by Interstate Freeway 680, and remain so. The <br />growth in new residential dwellings was not matched by a simultaneous <br />increase in commercial and industrial development. The new develop- <br />ment was commuter-oriented and Pleasanton turned rapidly from a small <br />but essentially self-sufficient town into a bedroom community. <br />The rapid growth and its manner of development placed strains on many <br />city services. Parks could not be improved to meet the burgeoning <br />demand. Roadways connecting the far-flung subdivisions remained <br />primarily the rural roads they once were and were quickly overloaded. <br />The city together with other valley communities and agencies scrambled <br />to secure additional water supplies and water treatment facilities <br />to meet the demand. City services were upgraded and expanded as <br />quickly as possible, staying always one jump behind the rampant <br />growth. The strains placed on all the city°s functions first reached <br />the breaking point in connection with sewage treatment facilities <br />Both the city's Sunol Sewage Treatment Plant and the Dublin San <br />Ramon Services District (DSRSD) Secvage Treatment Plant (which <br />serves roughly one-half of Pleasanton) have had connection bans <br />periodically imposed upon them by the Regional Vlater Quality Control <br />Boards since 1971. <br />Due to the periodic imposition of sewer connection bans and the <br />tightening of sewage disposal standards, the city°s growth has <br />followed an inconsistent pattern. As sewer connections became avail- <br />able, development would spurt ahead only to regress as new standards <br />or restrictions were imposed. Pleasanton has grown to 33,650 persons <br />in 1977, the new residential development coming in fits and starts <br />coinciding with the unpredictable availability of sewer connections. <br />New development in this period has continued to be primarily resi- <br />dential in character, still commuter-oriented, and still haphazardly <br />located throughout the community. Commercial and industrial develop- <br />ment has again lagged behind residential development. The new growth <br />in this period, while slower than before, was not directed to ease <br />.any of the strains created by the earlier rapid growth. It was, <br />rather, a continuation of the same type and manner of development <br />which had created the original strains. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.