Laserfiche WebLink
RESIDEidTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN PLEASANTON <br />The rapid residential development experienced in Pleasanton in the <br />past produced attractive, pleasant residential neighborhoods which <br />remain highly desirable places to live. The neighborhoods, however, <br />were scattered throughout the city with little thought to efficient <br />provision of community facilities or the environmental effects of <br />the development. Community facilities such as major thoroughfares, <br />utility systems, parks, and schools were hard pressed to keep pace <br />with the rate and haphazardness of the rapid development. Even <br />today, after five years of relatively slower growth, many of the <br />community facilities have not "caught up" to the level necessary for <br />Pleasanton's existing population. Unfortunate environmental impacts <br />still affect many areas - groundwater degradation, air pollution, <br />houses located in flood zones and in noise-impacted areas, traffic <br />congestion, etc. <br />Future residential development can occur in a manner which further <br />aggravates the ability of the community to obtain adequate services; <br />alternatively, new residential development can occur in a manner <br />consistent with the provision of many community services. Occasion- <br />ally, even, new development may aid the provision of certain facili- <br />ties. The manner of development - its type, location, and relation- <br />ship to other developed areas and existing facilities - is crucial <br />in determining whether new residential development fosters or impedes <br />the efficient, effective provision of community facilities to both <br />new and existing residents. <br />Goal 4: To guide residential development in a manner which <br />ensures the efficient provision of community services <br />and, whenever possible, which affirmatively aids in the <br />provision of such services. <br />In order to aid the city`s ability to exercise present planning and <br />zoning powers, especially with respect to the control of the location, <br />timing, or amount of new development, a new planning tool should be <br />developed. <br />Policy 18: To develop a residential allocation program which <br />will regulate the yearly number of residential units, <br />their location, and their timing. <br />Many different landowners hold land within the Urbanization Line which. <br />they wish to develop. Frequently, a single landowner holds enough <br />land to accommodate all of Pleasanton's yearly growth, given the low <br />yearly growth rate. For any one landowner/developer to monopolize <br />the available development in any given year would be unfair to other <br />landowners/developers and it would limit consumer choice as well. <br />Developers can operate efficiently when building as few as 50 to 80 <br />units a year. Phased development of large parcels of land into <br />increments of this size would enable the landowner/developer to re- <br />-12- <br />