My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2127
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
2127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:34:27 AM
Creation date
7/26/2007 1:44:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/13/1982
DOCUMENT NO
2127
DOCUMENT NAME
GP-81-10
NOTES
CITY OF PLEASANTON
NOTES 2
AMEND GENERAL PLAN, ALLOW FOR MODIFICATIONS TO GROWTH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF CITY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- Commercial and industrial development, lagging behind residential <br />growth during Pleasanton's rapid growth period, was not sufficient to <br />serve the existing population prior to 1971 and has been unable to <br />"catch up" in the more recent slower growth years. Pleasanton's per <br />capita sales tax revenue, an index of commercial development relative <br />to residential development, has been the lowest in Alameda County <br />despite the presence of a largely upper middle class population growth. <br />Industrial development, too, has lagged. In 1975, over 85 per cent <br />of the principal wage earners residing in Pleasanton commuted out of <br />the city to their jobs; over 70 per cent had to commute out of the <br />Amador-Livermore Valley. Roughly two-thirds of the secondary wage <br />earners residing in Pleasanton worked elsewhere, also. While no in- <br />dustrial capacity has been eligible for Clean Water Act funding for <br />sewerage facilities, Pleasanton has attempted to include additional <br />capacity in the new sewerage facilities by using 100 local funds. In- <br />dustrial and major commercial development are necessities if Pleasanton <br />is to achieve a healthy balance between residential, commercial, and <br />industrial development. Primary among the benefits of such develop- <br />ment are a reduction in commuting (and its adverse air quality effects) <br />by providing jobs and appropriate shopping facilities for Pleasanton <br />residents and the provision of a healthy tax base to generate revenues <br />for the city services and capital improvements necessary to serve the <br />existing and future residents. <br />The above considerations are reflected in the following policies: <br />Policy 1: To encourage commercial and industrial development <br />which strengthens the local tax base and provides the <br />shopping and employment facilities necessary for Pleasanton <br />residents. <br />Policy 2: To encourage the establishment of the planned <br />regional shopping center as shown on the Land Use biap. <br />Policy 3: To encourage the establishment of industries within <br />the planning area compatible with the environmental,con- <br />straints of the valley, particularly air quality, and with <br />the existing and future work force of Pleasanton. <br />Policy 4: To secure sewerage capacity for commercial and <br />industrial development through all available means, in- <br />cluding, but not limited to, purchase of capacity and <br />"creation" of extra capacity through water saving meanso <br />Policy 5: To monitor sewerage facility capacity relative to <br />residential, commercial, and industrial development in <br />order to ensure capacity for balanced growth. <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.