My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2128
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
2128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:34:27 AM
Creation date
7/26/2007 1:41:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/13/1982
DOCUMENT NO
2128
NOTES
CITY OF PLEASANTON
NOTES 2
ADOPTION OF STAFF REPORT REGARDING "LOWER INCOME HOUSING"
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item 7b <br />Staff Report <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />January 13, 1982 <br />Page 3 <br />If for sale projects are to be considered under any lower income housing <br />exemption then several other factors should be evaluated. The H.U.D. <br />percent of income limitation on monthly housing costs is 25%. That is <br />to say that the total monthly housing costs for a lower income household <br />are limited to the following figures: <br />Number of Persons Number of Maximum Monthly* <br />in Household Bedrooms Re quired Housing Payment <br /> <br />1 1 $354 <br />2 1 & 2 406 <br />3 2 458 <br />4 2 & 3 508 <br />5 3 & 4 541 <br />6 4 572 <br />7 4 & 5 604 <br />8 5 635 <br />*Payment is to include all housing related costs, e. g. house <br />payment, association fees, insurance, taxes, utilities, etc. <br />Down payment for such housing is another factor. Unless the down payment <br />required in order to keep housing costs below the levels indicated above <br />is substantially paid by someone other than the household, it is unrealistic <br />to conceive of a lower income household being able to secure such. housing. <br />Considering current interest rates the chances of structuring a project <br />containing for sale units for households making less than 80% of the <br />regional median income (and in many cases substantially less than that) on <br />the private market are practically non-existent. Housing for these families <br />will most probably be built through government subsidies and/or through the <br />efforts of non-profit organizations. , <br />Staff Recommendation: The. Staf£ recommends that a. sharp distinction be <br />made between projects that are "affordable" in nature and those that are <br />actually designed to meet the needs of lower income households. In summary <br />then the staff recommends that a special allocation equivalent to at least <br />10% of the total housing units authorized for any given year should be set <br />aside for lower income housing. Such housing may be sponsored b n person <br />or organization and should have a minimum of 25% of its units ermanen 1 ~ ~ <br />reserved for individuals and families qualifying for federal to come <br />housing assistance as defined by H.U.D.-i.e., the household can make no <br />more than 80% of the Bay Area median for that specific household size and <br />spend no more than 25% of their gross income on housing costs (either <br />through rental or purchase). Only households meeting these criteria should <br />be exempted from the City's Growth Management Program through the lower <br />income housing exemption procedure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.