2184 - Laserfiche WebLink

assessment, you must make the finding that the mitigated negative declaration is appropriate for the project. The finding must be made prior to taking action on the project itself. in making this finding you should review the contents of Resolution No. 77-66 (Environmental Impact Guidelines and Procedures). Please refer to page 8 of the Guidelines for the definition of signi- ficant effect and pages 20 through 22 of the Guidelines for the details on determining significant effect. Staff Recommendation: The staff concurs with the action takti^.n by the City Council on May 11, 1582. We feel that the realign- ment of Johnson Drive would provide superior access to not only the Reynolds and Brown property but the Harris Realty, Denny's and Hungry Hunter sites. We feel that it would also improve the intersection of Johnson Drive and Hopyard Road thereby lesseni,ny the potential for traffic congestion in this area in the future. For this reason, we recommend approval of the modification of the Reynolds and Brown second phase PUD as shown on the deve].cp- ment plan for case PUD-82-12 subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2156, but modifying con- ditions number 1 and 7 of that resolution as shown in the attached letter to Tom Terrell dated 5/20/82; adding condi,tic,is 11, 12 as shown in that same letter; modifying condition number 2 of Resolution No. 2156 as follows: 2. Buildings on the two lots immediately to the east _ of the north/south leg of Owens Court originally received design approval as part of case PUD-80-14F Approval of the development plan for case PUD-82-12 supercedes the original approval for these two buildings and their design shall be resubmitted at a later date. And adding condition number 13 to Resolution No. 2156 which reads as follows: 13. That all buildings and/or structures must comply with all codes and ordinances in effect at the time required permits are issued by the building division. -4-