2184 - Laserfiche WebLink

The realigned Johnson Drive between the Johnson/Hopyard inter- -- section and the proposed driveway west of Denny's and FIUngry Hunter would be funded in conjunction with the Hopyard Road improvements now taking place. That portion of the realigned Johnson Drive between that driveway and Bannister Drive would be paid £or by Reynolds and Brown as would the remaining interior stxeets of the Reynolds and Brown development. The location of Bannister Drive and Owens Court would not. be changed from the locations shown on the originally submitted PUD.. Other changes i.nst.tuted b,~ the Cizy C+,7inci~. ur. i.Y.i i ~ ... .. -; ,-rf 3/11/82, hac; rc, do with t:he fi.n~al approval of ti~Ye buii~~5-n g:, p:¢'opcsed to be constructed i.n ptzase wo of the business park. 's`Gnir ~ontnission had recommended that each individual building l:e subject is design approval by the Design Review Board. The Council changed that. to require approval not on 1.y of. building design, bi;t let c;cn.'i.gr.iration and individual site use by the City Council after revie:.~ and recom- mendation by the full Planning Commission. Attached hereto i_s a letter to Tom Terrell of Reynolds and Brown explaining all cf the Council changes. Another aspect of the PUD whictz may change as a r:¢~sLi'. ^f tl~e Council action and redesign of Johnson Drive is the inclusion f .~:ommercial uses within the project. Originally, commercial. uses `lad been fore- seen in the northwest sector of the property. when Rednc'lds and Brown submitted their plan for the second phase, they ix.+dic,at:ed _, that they were no longer proposing commercial,. in this area, but would wish to devote the area to office uses instead. D'e~~~ as a result of the redesign, they feel that that porno::, of t:hr property between Bannister Drive and the realigned Johnsen Drive (northeast sector of the property) may be a good location far commercial uses. They have made no firm decisions or. t:ais matter yet, but the rewording of condition number 1 (as shown in ~`}~: attached May 20th letter to Tom Terrell) provides for ghat ce:n~ tingency in that it says that any land use estahl.isher i. cas,n PUD-80-14 (the PUD for the first phase of the devel.opm<aaa) may be located anywhere within the project so long as approval i,s granted by the City Council. A minor modification to the plan which has recently bFS:=n prapnsed by Reynolds and Brown is to extend Owens Court eastern= `=::Bannister Drive thereby forming a loop street. This design is preteraki±.e to the fire and police departments in that it allows them better access than does a cul-•de-:>ac. A mitigated negative declaration accompanies t_b.is ~.°~~o.r:. ).3a;ed on the Initial Environmental Study 3one for. this pr:aje>;,t., ''t ~s the staff's opinion that case PUD-f52.-12 would ha~re s~.gr:.f:icazr,: adverse effects on the environment but 'that certain: rr~c >-~:.,~a'r+e3 conditions of approval would reduce those impacts to an i.n;.i.gni_- ficant level. If your Commission concurs with this r*r,a.'~rc nmc;ztaa .-3._