My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2184
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
2184
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:34:29 AM
Creation date
7/26/2007 11:06:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/24/1982
DOCUMENT NO
2184
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-82-12
NOTES
REYNOLDS AND BROWN
NOTES 2
ALTERATION TO PRIMARY ACCESS
NOTES 3
I-580 AND HOPYARD RD
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Yes No <br />15. Is there any serious public controversy concerning <br />.the environmental effects of the proposed project? <br />If so, list below. <br />III. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br />1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the <br />quality of the environment, substantially seduce the <br />habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or <br />wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, <br />threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce <br />the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered <br />plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the <br />major periods of California history or prehistory? ,___ <br />2. Does the project have the potential to achieve <br />short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, <br />environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the <br />environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, <br />definitive period of time while long-term impacts ~~ <br />will endure well into the future.) .,~ -- <br />3. Does the project have impacts which are <br />Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? <br />(A project may impact on two or more separate resaurces <br />- where the impact on each resource is relatively small, <br />but where the effect of the total of Chose impacts (.,,..i <br />on the environment is significant.) ~ _..__ --- <br />4. Does the project have environmental effects <br />which will cause substantial adverse effects on <br />human beings, either directly or indirectly? ._..._ `~ <br />IV. STAFF RECOTMENDATION <br />I find the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the <br />environment and, thus, recommend a Negative Declaration be prepared. <br />I find that the mitigation measures recommealded in the Initial Study for <br />~. those aspects of the project which could have a significant effect would <br />reduce the effects to insignificant levels and, thus, if such measures <br />are included as conditions to project approval, I recommend a Negative <br />Declaration be prepared. <br />o I find the proposed project may have a significant effect on the <br />environment, and, thus, recommend an Environmental Impact Report be <br />prepared. <br />Date ~ ` ?___ <br />~' _ <br />Signature .._._ .______.___.~_. <br />_~_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.