2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 2006 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESCINDING THE APPEAL OF A DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVING A MINOR MODIFICATION FOR CASE PUD-80-1 FOR CPS & ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, Valley Business Associates (CPS Property Management Co., Inc.) has requested a modification to the street pattern approved as part of PUD-BO-1 and to the number, shapes and sizes of lots within that development; and WHEREAS, the approved plan shows 49 lots bordering on two semi-circular interior streets; and WHEREAS, the proposed revisions show 40 lots and a rectangular interior street system; and WHEREAS, where the minimum distance from the interior streets to the residences bordering the property on the west was approximately 200' previously, the minimum distance to those lots would now be 230 feet; and WHEREAS, in addition to requesting the new street design the applicant has asked that Condition No. 5 of case PUD-80-1 be removed since there is no longer a need for a connector between the two semi-circular streets; and WHEREAS, the applicant also asked that Condition No. 37 pertaining to the design of the sanitary sewer line serving the property be eliminated since an alternate design has subsequently been approved; and WHEREAS, the Director of Planning and Community Development, after consultation with the City Attorney and Director of Public Works and Utilities, determined that the abovementioned changes are nonsubstantial in nature, therefore, in accord- ance with Section 2-8.32, Article 2, Title II of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton, granted a minor modification to case PUD-80-1 with the understanding that no other condi- tions of approval beyond those mentioned above are being modified - all conditions pertaining to truck traffic, the 30' landscape buffer, private streets, maintenance of common area landscaping, street maintenance, hours of operation, hours of construction, building heights, the 75' building setback on the west, etc. remain as originally approved in case PUD-80-1 and PUD-79-13. NOW,