2024 - Laserfiche WebLink

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON COUNTY OF ALAMEDA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 2024 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR CASE PUD-81-4, APPLICATION OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. WHEREAS, Southern Pacific Transportation Company has applied for development plan approval of an approximately 80,000 sq. ft. commercial/office development to be located between First Street and the SPRR right-of-way from Angela Street, to the extension of Bernal Avenue and between Neal Street, Angela Street, the SPRR right-of-way and a line approxi- mately 250 ft, east of Main Street and rezoning of the site to PUD-Commercial/Offices; also to rezone the DeLucchi and Wayside Parks located on the west side of First Street between Angela Street and a point approxi- mately 350 ft. north of Neal Street from the C-C (Central Commercial) to PUD (Planned Unit Development-Park) District. The property is zoned C-C (Central Commercial) and O (Office) District; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 15, 1981 at which time all public testimony and documents were considered; and WHEREAS, said proposal was based upon an Initial Study done pursuant to the Environmental Impact Guidelines and Procedures adopted by the City Council of the City of Pleasanton by Resolution No. 77-66; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its meeting of July 15, 1981 received the Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration in a report from the Director of Planning and Community Development dated July 15, 1981 regarding the aforementioned project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission was advised by the. City Attorney of its responsibilities in reviewing the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and the determinations required by Section 5.4 (e) of Resolution No. 77-66; and WHEREAS, each member of the Planning Commission had before him/her copies of Resolution No. 77-66 at the time of considering the proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study; and WHEREAS, the public was afforded an opportunity to comment on the _ proposed environmental assessment, which had previously been published in the Valley Times, at the time of the public hearing on the aforementioned project; and