My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2031
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
2031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:34:06 AM
Creation date
7/24/2007 9:51:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/1981
DOCUMENT NO
2031
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-81-15
NOTES
M.A.I. INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES 2
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF 2 STORY OFFICE BUILDING
NOTES 3
E.S. CORNER OF STONERIDGE DR. AND FOOTHILL RD.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />_ CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2031 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING <br />APPROVAL OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />PREPARED FOR CASE PUD-81-15, M.A.I. INDUSTRIES, INC. <br />WHEREAS, M.A.I. Industries, Inc. has applied for development <br /> plan approval which would allow the construction of a <br /> 48,000 sq. ft., two-story office building to be <br /> located at the southeast corner of Stoneridge Drive <br /> and Foothill Road; and <br />WHEF.EAS, the property is zoned "PUD-Commercial/Office" District; and <br />WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 15, 1981 at which <br /> time all pertinent documents and testimony were <br /> considered; and <br />WHEREAS, said proposal was based upon an Initial Study done <br /> pursuant to the Environmental Impact Guidelines and <br /> Procedures adopted by the City Council of the City of <br /> Pleasanton by Resolution No. 77-66; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its meeting of July 15, 1981, <br /> received the Initial Study and proposed Negative <br /> Declaration in a report from the Director of Planning <br /> and Community Development dated July 15, 1981 regarding <br /> the aforementioned project; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission was advised by the City Attorney <br /> of its responsibilities in reviewing the proposed <br /> Negative Declaration and the determinations required <br /> by Section 5.4(e) o£ Resolution No. 77-66; and <br />WHEREAS, each member of the Planning Commission had before him/ <br /> her copies of Resolution No. 77-66 at the time of <br /> considering the proposed Negative Declaration and <br /> Initial Study; and <br />WHEREAS, the public was afforded an opportunitX to comment on <br /> the proposed environmental assessment, which had previously <br /> been published in the Valley Times, at the time of the <br /> public hearing on the aforementioned project; and <br />WHEREAS, upon receipt of the staff report and public input, the <br /> Planning Commission reviewed the provisions of the <br /> City's Guidelines and Processing Procedures for the <br /> evaluation of projects and preparation of Environmental <br /> Impact Reports as they pertain to requirements for <br /> Negative Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports <br /> in order to determine i£ a Negative Declaration is <br /> appropriate for the project and what mitigation <br /> measures, if any, must be undertaken to ensure that the <br /> project will not have a significant impact upon the environment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.