2756 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. 2756 February 12, 1986 Page 2 g.3 Fact. Condition 11 requires street lighting, landscaping and trees to be maintained by the owners' association or maintenance district. g.4 Fact. Condition 10 requires that the owners' association pay to maintain on-site streets for ten years after Project development. g.5 Finding. The No Project Alternative, which would avoid this impact, is infeasible. g.6 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of the No Project Alternative). VII. Geology A. Significant Effect. Geological hazards from ground shaking and expansive soils. a.l Finding. The mitigation measure incorporated into the Project to mitigate geological hazards will substantially lessen the effect. a.2 Fact. Condition 27 requires that all buildings comply with current City seismic requirements. a.3 Fact. Condition 27 requires that foundation support and retaining walls be designed to resist the effect of ground shaking. A pile foundation system will be used for mid-rise buildings unless a compensating design is found to be feasible. Minimum setback of one hundred feet from the top of stream channel edge is required. a.4 Fact. Selected grading measures, soil treatment measures or special construction techniques will be included as a part of the soils report for each individual site and for public improvements. a.5 Fact. A standard tentative map condition will require the Developer to have a soils engineer available during the construction of buildings on the site. a.6 Finding. The No Project Alternative, which would avoid the impact, is infeasible and unnecessary because the mitigation measures which have been incorporated into the Project substantially lessen the effect. a.7 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of the No Project Alternative).