Laserfiche WebLink
g.3 Fact. Condition 11 requires street lighting, <br />landscaping and trees to be maintained by the <br />owners' association or maintenance district. <br />g.4 Fact. Condition 10 requires that the owners' <br />association pay to maintain on-site streets for ten <br />years after Project development. <br />g.5 Finding. The No Project Alternative, which would <br />avoid this impact, is infeasible. <br />g.6 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of the No <br />Project Alternative). <br />VII. Geology <br />A. Significant Effect. Geological hazards from ground <br />shaking and expansive soils. <br />a.l Finding. The mitigation measure incorporated into <br />the Project to mitigate geological hazards will <br />substantially lessen the effect. <br />a.2 Fact. Condition 27 requires that all buildings <br />comply with current City seismic requirements. <br />a.3 Fact. Condition 27 requires that foundation <br />support and retaining walls be designed to resist <br />the effect of ground shaking. A pile foundation <br />system will be used for mid-rise buildings unless a <br />compensating design is found to be feasible. <br />Minimum setback of one hundred feet from the top of <br />stream channel edge is required. <br />a.4 Fact. Selected grading measures, soil treatment <br />measures or special construction techniques will be <br />included as a part of the soils report for each <br />individual site and for public improvements. <br />a.5 Fact. A standard tentative map condition will <br />require the Developer to have a soils engineer <br />available during the construction of buildings on <br />the site. <br />a.6 Finding. The No Project Alternative, which would <br />avoid the impact, is infeasible and unnecessary <br />because the mitigation measures which have been <br />incorporated into the Project substantially lessen <br />the effect. <br />a.7 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of the No <br />Project Alternative). <br />- 22 - <br />