Laserfiche WebLink
because the mitigation measures which have been <br />incorporated into the Project substantially lessen <br />the effect. <br />e.6 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of <br />alternatives). <br />F. Significant Effect. Increased demand for adult <br />recreational facilities of all types. <br />f.l Findinq. Incorporation of recreational facilities <br />in the Project is economically infeasible. <br />f.2 Fact. The assessments placed on the Project <br />property and its value make infeasible its use for <br />recreational facilities. <br />f.3 Findinq. Surplus revenues generated by North <br />Pleasanton development, including the Project, may <br />be available to acquire and develop new park and <br />recreational facilities. <br />f.4 Fact. The Project will generate revenues in excess <br />of its expenses. <br />f.5 Findinq. Inclusion of payment of fees for <br />recreational facilities and cooperation in <br />providing funding substantially lessens this <br />impact. <br />f.6 Fact. Condition 28 requires developer fees and <br />cooperation. <br />f.7 Findinq. The No Project Alternative, the Reduced <br />Intensity Alternative, and the Mixed Use <br />Alternative, which could partially mitigate the <br />potential significant effect, are infeasible and <br />unnecessary because the mitigation measures which <br />have been incorporated into the Project <br />substantially lessen the effect. <br />f.8 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of <br />alternatives). <br />G. Significant Effect. Increased maintenance costs for <br />additional Project streets. <br />g.l Finding. The mitigation measures incorporated into <br />the Project to mitigate the demands for increased <br />maintenance will substantially lessen the effect. <br />g.2 Fact. Condition 10 requires an owner's association <br />or maintenance district to extend street-sweeping <br />services to the Project. <br />- 21 - <br />