My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
2757
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
2757
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2008 10:35:29 AM
Creation date
7/16/2007 10:08:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/12/1986
DOCUMENT NO
2757
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-85-8
NOTES
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
NOTES 3
AMEND LAND USE, CIRCULATION,A ND GROWTH FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR BUSINESS PARK COMPLEX
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
have been incorporated into the Project <br />substantially lessen the effect. <br />c.4 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of <br />alternatives) and Section V (Noise Mitigation). <br />D. Significant Effect. Increased pressure for development <br />on transitional commercial areas to the east of the <br />Project in the vicinity of Old Santa Rita Road. <br />d.l Finding. Private and/or public redevelopment and <br />packaging of parcels can lessen the effect. <br />d.2 Fact. City zoning regulations and design review <br />procedures require development complementary to its <br />surroundings. Large, developable parcels have been <br />created through private packaging of marginal-sized <br />parcels. <br />d.3 Finding. The No Project Alternative, which could <br />partially mitigate the significant effect, is <br />infeasible. <br />d.4 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of the No <br />Project Alternative). <br />E. Significant Effect. Demand for higher densities and <br />development multiple-family residential lands to the <br />east of the Project. <br />e.l Finding. Local zoning and growth management <br />procedures will substantially lessen significant <br />effects. <br />e.2 Fact. Rezoning and a General Plan Amendment <br />allowing for higher density on a case-by-case basis <br />will lessen the housing demand and will reduce the <br />overall demand. <br />e.3 Finding. Local housing economics will not support <br />densities greater than presently allowed. <br />e.4 Fact. Developers have refused City offered higher <br />densities, preferring to build at traditional <br />suburban apartment densities. <br />e.5 Finding. The No Project Alternative, which could <br />partially mitigate the significant effect, is <br />infeasible. <br />e.6 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of the No <br />Project Alternative). <br />F. Significant Effect The Project will result in increased <br />employment with an increase in demand for housing and <br />associated impacts (noise, traffic, etc.) <br />- 12 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.