Laserfiche WebLink
effect on the azea. He stated that he would like to know what is happening to the Spotomo <br />property. <br />Acting Chairperson asked staff for an update on the Spotomo property and inquired if the <br />Planning Commission approved the rock stone walls or if these were installed by the developer <br />and not a part of the PUD. <br />Ms. Decker replied that the entryway for the Heartwood Communities was approved as part of <br />the development plan. She indicated that she would bring information back regazding the <br />Spotomo property to the Commission at a later time. <br />Dolores Bengtson, 568 Hamilton Way, read her comments regazding the Oak Grove project. She <br />expressed concern about the deletion of the internal trails and staging area from the project's <br />proposed 497 acres of public space in the preferred 51-unit Alternative 4. She stated that the <br />initial proposal for 98 homes included a public staging azea, a complete network of internal trails <br />and a segment for a future regional trail, and a 6.5-acre neighborhood pazk, all consistent with <br />the approved 1993 Community Trails Master Plan. She noted that there was no community <br />participation in the discussions that resulted in Alternative 4 and understood that the reason for <br />the deletion of the staging azea and internal trails was to satisfy the Kottinger Ranch <br />homeowners' desire to eliminate the potential traffic generated by public open space use. She <br />pointed out that the Dra$ Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project stated that the <br />trails, staging azea, and park would not have a significant impact on traffic. <br />Ms. Bengtson then proceeded to explain the importance of staging azeas and trails for citizens to <br />enjoy the view and beauty of the open space and specific areas of interest. She encouraged the <br />Commission to evaluate this project cazefully not only as it relates to complying with high <br />standazds for good residential planning but also in terms of good planning for public use of open <br />space, indicating that its recommendations could either provide 51 new estate homeowners a <br />497-acre private preserve or the community with a priceless resource that all citizens can enjoy. <br />Acting Chairperson Fox stated that she sent an email to the Pazks and Recreafion Commission in <br />which was discussed at that Commission's meeting and requested staff to distribute a copy of <br />that email as well as the minutes from that meeting to the rest of the Planning Commissioners. <br />She inquired if the matter will come before the Pazks and Recreation Commission before the <br />Planning Commission hearing. <br />Commissioner Blank advised that he is not making a comment because he recused himself from <br />this project. He inquired when the matter would come before the Planning Commission. <br />Ms. Decker stated that the matter would come before the Pazks and Recreation Commission <br />before the Planning Commission but that the date has not yet been set. She advised that the work <br />to be undertaken to respond to the comments on the Draft EIR is very detailed and is taking <br />longer than anticipated. She indicated that it should be completed in mid-January, and staff <br />would then need time to review and analyze the project. She noted that the matter of the trails <br />and staging area would be a point of discussion at the heazing. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 27, 2006 Page 2 of 19 <br />