PC 122706 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner O'Connor noted that having items on the Consent Calendaz has helped the Commission and recalled that only two items have been pulled from the Calendaz for further discussion but was also approved that evening. He stated that this would streamline the process, cutting down on the amount of time applicants have to wait for staff to put a report together and then schedule for a Commission hearing, something the City wants. Commissioner Olson recalled that Ms. Decker had key points to which she wanted to call the Commission's attention. Ms. Decker noted that there were two items whose language needed to be reviewed: (1) Item 4 of Exhibit A on page 2, which relates to the ability of the Planning Director to refer an approved permitted use to the Commission for mitigation or revocation if a neighbor were to complain about impacts such as noise or pazking. She noted that staff wanted to take a closer look at this matter because they may be in conflict with other provisions of the Code in terms of where it puts the City and the risks that may ensue from such actions. (2) Item 5 of Exhibit A on page 2, which relates to incompatible uses in the I zoning district such as lazge daycaze facilities and gymnasiums in the same complex as a roofing company which may emit noxious fumes. She noted that staff would like to take a closer look at this matter and have the Commission's input in terms of whether to limit or prohibit incompatible uses, have the tenant sign an acknowledgement of the existence of businesses with aze noise or emit fumes, or something else. Acting Chairperson Fox requested staff to give a general idea of where the different zoning districts in the City aze located. Ms Decker replied that it might be more helpful to the Commission if staff brought this back with additional information and a zoning map which would identify where those areas are located. In relation to Item I. under Chapter 18.40 on page 6 of Exhibit A, Commissioner Blank requested clarification on the location of private schools with 300 feet of personal wireless service facilities. Acting Chairperson Fox explained that the original amendment provided that no nursery schools, childcaze facility, elderly facility, or similaz facilities may be located within 300 feet of a personal wireless service facilities. Commissioner Peazce stated that she found streamlining the process for facilities with 25 students or less to be a great idea and would like to have additional information on the recently approved conditional use permits to nail down some of the issues in the past and see what the right number is based on the nexus of size and problems. Commissioner Blank agreed and stated that doing something for less than 25 would be amenable. Acting Chairperson Fox preferred the number to be between 15 or 20. She added that she would also like to look at pazking in the Downtown azea for all those who might arrive at one time, for example, for a class of 25 who might need to find pazking, as opposed to those who aze dropped off. Commissioner O'Connor noted that pazking analysis would be part of the process. Commissioner Blank noted that this would depend on uses, for example, a tutoring class of two hours each would generate less trips than a 30-minute class. Ms. Harryman noted that the number includes employees at the facility. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 27, 2006 Page 15 of 19