My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121306
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 121306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:28:28 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 10:13:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/13/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 121306
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regazding whether the City had any <br />discretion in how the fees were applied, Mr. Tassano replied that the City had specific projects <br />that were identified in the traffic fees. The fee was assessed based on the number of trips <br />generated from a project, and the total cost was dependent on the project. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regazding whether the Bemal Bridge <br />would be open by the time Home Depot opened, Mr. Tassano replied that they did not anticipate <br />that. Commissioner O'Connor wanted to ensure that it would not be delayed. Mr. Tassano <br />noted that staff considered it ahigh-priority project. <br />Commissioner Blank expressed concern about the light at Nevada Street. Mr. Tassano noted that <br />intersection was approaching apeak-hour delay. Commissioner Blank noted that there was a <br />blind spot that made it very difficult to see and found it astonishing that anyone could safely <br />make alert-hand tum at that light. <br />Commissioner Pearce believed that weekends during the summertime would be a major peak use <br />for Home Depot, which coincided with the waterslide. Mr. Tassano noted that the traffic studies <br />examined the worst-case scenarios for lowest and highest uses. While the waterslide produced <br />more trips on the weekend, the overall volume of service on the city streets would still be lower. <br />A discussion of the derivation of trip rates, internal capture, and pass-by percentages ensued. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding the percentage of traffic that would be <br />newly attracted to the facility versus passersby, the applicant indicated that the rate was <br />48 percent. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regazding whether an ordinance could be created <br />to make Valley Avenue between Santa Rita Road and First Street closed to truck traffic, <br />Mr. Tassano noted that the Municipal Code was not set up to define any given truck route. <br />However, trucks were allowed on these streets if they were headed for a commercial destination. <br />He noted that an enforcement effort was ongoing. <br />Ms. Hartyman believed the Commissioners were asking whether an ordinance could be adopted <br />prohibiting trucks on certain streets. She noted that the Vehicle Code in State law provides that <br />the State controlled the streets unless they gave the City the specific authority in certain areas. <br />She added that she would reseazch that issue further. She believed the City could decide where <br />trucks would be allowed. As faz as conditioning this specific project, it would be done as an <br />ordinance rather than in the conditions of approval. <br />Commissioner O'Connor believed the last meeting included specific discussion of the Home <br />Depot trucks traveling from I-580 to Isabel Avenue rather than through Stanley Boulevazd; he <br />did not see that mentioned in the conditions of approval. <br />Ms. Harryman did not recall that specific discussion but noted that the City has encouraged <br />particulaz routes in past projects. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 13, 2006 Page 6 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.