PC 121306 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Decker presented the following additional notations to the conditions of approval: 1. With respect to the parking stalls on the Bernal side, language would be modified to add "subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director and the City Engineer. " 2. Condition No. 39 of Exhibit E requires wheel stops in the parking areas, which was an older standazd. Home Depot had requested not to have them as they could be considered as trip hazazds and they captured more debris, making it more difficult to clean the site. She requested a recommendation to the Commission to consider removing the requirement for wheel stops. 3. Condition No. 41 of Exhibit E was a lengthy backflow prevention, which was shortened in an effort to provide clarity; the current condition would be inserted. 4. All language referring to "retention" in Exhibit E should be changed to "swale." Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. Commissioner Blank proposed an amendment that the noise level not exceed 60 dBA at the plane of the property prior to 8:00 a.m. or after 10:00 p.m. Commissioners Pearce and Olson accepted the proposed amendment. Ms. Decker noted that as in the past, language would be added that the noise level meet the requirements of the Pleasanton Municipal Code Noise Ordinance. In response to an inquiry by Acting Chairperson Fox regazding what would happen if no building permits were pulled and the land was sold in five years, Mr. Pavan replied that if no permits were pulled within a yeaz, the approvals would expire. The Code allows for design review approvals two one-yeaz extensions, for a total of three years. Commissioner O'Connor proposed an amendment to condition a parking analysis for any parking intensive uses with zoning certificate and/or business license applications to ensure that there was adequate parking to accommodate future uses. Ms. Decker noted that was a current planning practice to accommodate more pazking for intensive uses. Commissioner O'Connor wished to address further traffic mitigation on Valley Avenue. Commissioner Blank inquired whether additional traffic mitigation fees could be required if the traffic mitigation measures did not work. Ms. Decker replied that would not be possible and that mitigations would be based on the current traffic analyses. Ms. Hatryman noted that this addressed a nexus between the money the City could exact from the project based on the traffic study and that it was not subject to negotiation. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 13, 2006 Page 18 of 26