My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121306
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 121306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:28:28 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 10:13:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/13/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 121306
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
appropriate for a Commercial Neighborhood type of development, not for a Central Commercial <br />District azea. She could support Long's Drugs and Stazbucks as well as other appropriately <br />scaled retail uses in this neighborhood. She believed the 48 percent passers-by assumption was <br />too high for this type of establishment. She believed a 24-hour drive-through at Long's Drugs <br />was completely unacceptable in this location and that the height of the out structures at 41 feet <br />was out of scale for this part of the City. She believed the hours would be more appropriate for a <br />location neaz a freeway. She noted that Pleasanton has never had an East Side Specific Plan and <br />noted that these types of applications were approved in a piecemeal fashion. She believed that <br />the Commission must take into account lost revenue from locally-owned businesses, including <br />some of the local flooring and hardware stores along the Valley Avenue/Quarry Lane area. She <br />noted that the cost of policing a 24-hour drive-through would be another cost to the City. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regazding whether the Vintage Hills Shopping <br />Center area had been notified, Ms. Decker confirmed that was the case. Commissioner Blank <br />did not believe that any storeowners had spoken in opposition to this application. <br />Commissioner Pearce moved to find that the proposed project will not have a significant <br />environmental impact and that the Negative Declaration is appropriate; to find that the <br />proposed project conforms to the General Plan; to make the PUD development plan and <br />conditional use findings as stated in the staff report; and to recommend approval to the <br />City Council of the Negative Declaration, Cases PUD-81-25-7M, PCUP-165, and PDR-529, <br />subject to the conditions of approval as shown on Exhibits C, D, and E, respectively, of the <br />staff report, as recommended and modified by staff. <br />Ms. Decker summarized the modifications to the conditions discussed by the Commission: <br />1. No loading doors shall be painted orange; <br />2. Liquor stores would be excluded from the list of "Conditional Uses" shown on Exhibit C, <br />as proposed by Commissioner Olson. <br />3. Modify Condition No. l.f. of Exhibit D, Truck Deliveries, to address truck trips and truck <br />routes of vehicles over which Home Depot had control and to allow no deliveries during <br />the hours of services at the synagogue (8:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. on Fridays and 8:00 a.m. - <br />1:00 p.m. on Saturdays); <br />4. Identify specific seasonal sales for temporary use pernut processing; <br />5. Modify Condition No. S.h. of Exhibit E, regazding the undergrounding of the 60 KV lines <br />to add language that staff will work with the applicant and the appropriate agencies to <br />look into the possibility of undergrounding these lines; <br />6. Incorporate the azchitectural designs recommended by Larry Cannon; <br />7. Add a condition to eliminate any grill facilities at the Lot 2 pad; and <br />8. Add a condition to install a berm on the Nevada Court side to address noise attenuation. <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that she would include those modifications in the motion. <br />Commissioner Blank proposed an amendment that Home Depot provide written directives <br />to all vendors to use the same route and require compliance with these directives. <br />Commissioner Pearce accepted the proposed modification. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 13, 2006 Page 17 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.