Laserfiche WebLink
windowsills from five feet to six feet above floor level would provide more privacy. He <br />noted that to bring this project to 40-percent FAR compliance, the back of the house must be <br />brought up about five feet, which would not resolve height, massing, and privacy issues. <br />Commissioner Fox moved to deny PADR-1338/PV-131, based on the fact that the <br />findings as listed in the staff report could not be made. <br />Commissioner Arkin seconded the motion. <br />Chairperson Arkin reiterated that he also wished this application could have first come before <br />the Planning Commission as a workshop. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Blank, Fox, and Pearce. <br />NOES: Commissioner Olson. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />Resolution No. PC-2006-52 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />Commissioner Fox suggested that mediation may be helpful in the appeal process. <br />Chairperson Arkin noted that an appeal to the City Council maybe filed within 15 days <br />c. PUD-93-02-09M, Barnabas Naav <br />Work Session to review and provide comment for a proposal to allow the conversion <br />of the existing Ruby Hill sales office to a restaurant, the revision of the configuration <br />of the existing pazking lot, the establishment of a new driveway off of Vineyard <br />Avenue, and a future home site with design guidelines. The property is located at <br />2001 Ruby Hill Drive and is zoned PUD/OS/A/LDR (Planned Unit <br />Development/Open Space/Agriculture/Low Density Residential) District. <br />This item was continued to October 11, 2006. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />Streamlining Task Force <br />Commissioner Fox would like more information about the task force on the Downtown and <br />noted that the Pazks and Recreation Commission had a Trails Ad Hoc committee. She was <br />concerned that it was not publicly announced that members of the task force were being <br />sought and that the members were being privately appointed, resulting in a larger than <br />normal majority of developers. She was concerned that it may be tilted towards the <br />developers' benefits than being balanced with residents' needs. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 27, 2006 Page 14 of 17 <br />