My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091306
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 091306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:25:01 PM
Creation date
7/12/2007 9:58:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/13/2006
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 091306
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, O’Connor, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Arkin. <br /> <br />Resolutions Nos. PC-2006-46, approving PCUP-171; PC-2006-47, approving PCUP-178; <br />PC-2006-48, approving PCUP-178; and PC-2006-49, approving PCUP-179, were entered <br />and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> <br />b. PDR-537/PCUP-169, Presbyterian Church <br />Application for design review approval and for a conditional use permit for a <br />stressed membrane (Sprung) structure located at 3410–3440 Ironwood Court. <br />Zoning for the property is PUD-P&I and Mixed P&I (Planned Unit Development <br /> <br />– Public & Institutional and Mixed Public & Institutional) District. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker summarized the staff report and described the scope, layout, and background <br />of this application. She noted that the phasing plan had recently been revised. She <br />displayed the originally approved site plan and described the recent modifications. She <br />then displayed the modified phasing plan and described the proposed location for the <br />Sprung structure. She noted that the proposal was to erect the Sprung structure whereby <br />Building C and Building D would be constructed first, after which the permanent <br />structure, Building B, would be built. The Church proposed a limit of ten years to allow <br />it adequate time for fundraising to construct the complete first phase. At that time, or <br />after 10 years, Building B would replace the Sprung structure. The final buildout of <br />Phase III shows Building C connected with the vertical portion of the structure, which <br />would complete the site. Ms. Decker noted that representatives of Ponderosa Homes had <br />indicated that the original PUD required street tree planting along Busch Road and Valley <br />Avenue, which had been done. They were concerned about the location of additional <br />street trees or perimeter plantings as required by the conditions. Ponderosa Homes noted <br />that it would like the screening and the trees to be actually planted before occupancy. <br />Staff had conditioned the project to add landscape screening along the southwest <br />perimeter. Conditions Nos. 15-17 identified that a landscaping plan must be submitted <br />and reviewed by the Planning Director prior to building permit issuance. A condition <br />was included that addressed the additional screening on-site to be 24-inch box to provide <br />healthier specimens along the streetscapes on Valley Avenue and Busch Road, which <br />would further enhance the screening of this structure. Ms. Decker noted that the original <br />PUD required the buildings to meet the Green Building Ordinance although the size was <br />less than what the ordinance required. She noted that many of the materials used in the <br />structure were recycled. Fire sprinklers would be installed in the building. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 13, 2006 Page 4 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.