PC 072606 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Blank commended Ms. Stern and Mr. Tassano for doing a great job with the staff reports, noting that they included a large amount of detail that assisted the Commission in its consideration. No action was taken. b. PUD-33. James Ton¢. Charter Proaerties Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) development plan approval to subdivide an approximately 20-acre site into eight-lots, consisting of seven single- family lots for custom homes and one lot for a City water tank. The property is located at 5 Windy Oaks Drive (formerly 1680 Vineyard Avenue) in the Vineyazd Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area and is zoned PUD-HR/OS (Planned Unit Development -Hillside Residential/Open Space) District. This item was continued to a future Planning Commission meeting. c. rAr-yo, ALLOn A1QrICn, ADpellanr IYALK-1„L. vrcror r.asrev~ Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of an application for administrative design review approval to construct an approximately 1,020-square-foot detached single-story second dwelling unit in the rear of the existing residence located at 4767 Harrison Street. Zoning for the property is r" RM-1,500 (Multiple-Family Residential) District. Ms. Decker advised that this project is an appeal of a Zoning Administrator decision, and because she had rendered the decision as Zoning Administrator, Ms. Leslie Mendez, Assistant Planner, will present this project. She added that the same holds for Item 6.d. Steve and Cazol Stanton, Anoellants (PARR-1542, Robert Sweeney Construction, for Jim Rhoades . Ms. Mendez presented the staff report, describing the project as an appeal of a Zoning Administrator's approval of an approximately 1,020-squaze-foot second unit at the rear of the applicant's property located at 4767 Harrison Street. She noted that the project meets all the required setbacks, height, floor azea ratio, and second unit regulations of the Municipal Code. She stated that a Zoning Administrator hearing was held on June 22, 2006, at which the Zoning Administrator approved the project, which was subsequently appealed by Mr. Aldrich, property owner to the north of the subject site. Ms. Mendez stated that the appellant expressed three concerns: (1) No additional parking space is being provided as required per the Municipal Code and that the residents of the second unit would pazk on his property. Staff has indicated that no additional pazking space is required for the main structure, as the size of the main structure will not be changed. She further noted that there are two proposed standard pazking spaces and that the applicant will be required to provide a pazking space for the second unit. (2) A ~, portion of the shrubs lining Mr. Aldrich's property was removed by the applicant. Staff noted that this is a civil matter that will have to be settled by both parties. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 26, 2006 Page 11 of 24