PC 062806 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ Commissioner O'Connor commented that he concurred with staff's recommendation regazding the order of the items and believed that Ponderosa Homes should be heazd respecting the number of people present to speak and so as not to risk the item being continued. There was consensus by the Commission to heaz the items in the following order: 1. Item S.a., PUD-OS-O1M/PDR-541, Frank and Barbara Berlogaz 2. Item S.b., PUD-44, Barbara Young 3. Item 6.a., PAP-93, Dennis and Barbaza Georgatos (PARR-1472, Stan and Stacey Knight) 4. Item 6.c., Public Safety Element of the General Plan, and Item 7.b., Residential Sprinklers for New Construction 5. Item 6.b., PUD-51, Generations Healthcare, Inc., continued to July 26, 2006 6. Item 6.d., PUD-32, Daniel and Belinda Sarich, continued to July 12, 2006 7. Item 6.e., PUD-50, Ponderosa Homes, due to the high number of residents in the audience 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS Matters Continued for Decision a. PAP-93. Dennis and Barbara GeorQatos. Appellants (PADR-1472. Stan and ~, Stacev I{niahtl Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of an application for administrative design review to construct: (1) an approximately 180-squaze-foot covered patio; (2) an approximately 292-squaze-foot first-floor addition on the reaz; and (3) an approximately 1,251-square-foot second-story addition over part of the center and side portions of the existing residence located at 779 Mirador Court. Zoning for the property is R-1-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) District. This item was continued from June 14, 2006. Ms. Decker noted that staff had provided the Planning Commission with a thorough presentation describing the background and scope of this item. The Commission had requested more information on aCity-sponsored mediation facilitation process for this project. Ms. Harryman had indicated that any mediation process required willing participants. Staff had worked diligently for the past two weeks and determined that the City did not have the funding or the staffing resources to proceed with the costs incurred for the facilitation/mediation process for this process. Internal discussions identified that if a mediation process were to ensue, the Director of Planning and Community Development, Jeny Iserson, would be that facilitator. She noted that a number of neighborhood and on-site meetings with all interested parties had been held with no success in determining compromises that could be easily reached where all parties could agree. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 2006 Page 4 of 26