PC 062806 - Laserfiche WebLink

5. Item S.b., PUD-44, Bazbaza Young Ms. Decker further recommended that Item 6.c., Generations Healthcaze, Inc., be continued. She noted that a number of documents regarding historical approvals had been distributed to the Commission, and staff had been made awaze by Commissioner Fox that there were more documents that had not been included. Staff would like to meet with Commissioner Fox to review those documents in order to provide a complete set of documents to the Planning Commission. In addition, staff received a telephone call from Ms. Bonnie Kirchbaum requesting that the project be continued to July 26, 2006 because she would be on vacation and wanted to be sure to have the option to speak at the hearing. She was advised that considerable testimony had previously taken place in this project which would continue to be on record. The applicant also strongly felt that the project should be continued to July 12, 2006. On record, Mr. Steven Black, applicant, wished to address the Planning Commission from the applicant's perspective. She recommended that the Planning Commission hear Mr. Black's statement, and make a determination on the continuation date. In addition, Ms. Decker recommended that Item 6.d., PUD-32, Daniel and Belinda Sarich, be continued to July 12, 2006, to provide additional time for staff and former Commissioner Mary Roberts to discuss some issues on the application. Steve Black, Generations Healthcaze, Inc., stated that he would appreciate it if Item 6.b. ~.., could be heard on July 12, 2006. He was anxious to reach a resolution to this issue regazding the events of 1971-72. He noted that interest rates have been climbing since this project was initiated and would like to be able to move forwazd on this project. He added that the applicants had adjusted their vacation schedules to accommodate the July 12, 2006 date. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin regazding the reason for the neighbors' request to continue the matter to July 26, 2006, Ms. Decker replied that some neighbors would be on vacation and would like to attend in person. Chairperson Arkin polled the Commission regazding their preferences. Commissioner Fox preferred July 26 because of the lazge volume of material to review and added that the July 4a' holiday cut into available time. Commissioner Olson preferred the July 26 meeting. Commissioner Peazce agreed with Commissioner Fox's assessment of the time needed to review the material and preferred July 26. Commissioner Blank concurred with the other Commissioners. Chairperson Arkin noted that the Commission's preference was to continue the item to July 26, 2006. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 2006 Page 3 of 26